Acuity PPM Review 2026: Pros, Cons, Features & Pricing
Portfolio management gets difficult when intake, priorities, capacity, and delivery are tracked in different places. The right system should give PMOs a clearer way to evaluate work, allocate resources, and make portfolio-level decisions without falling back on spreadsheets and slide decks.
Acuity PPM is one of the project portfolio management tools that brings work intake, prioritization, portfolio planning, resource capacity, and project delivery into one governed system. It’s a strong fit for PMOs moving beyond spreadsheets and presentation-based reporting, especially when portfolio visibility and governance matter more than day-to-day task management.
Acuity PPM Evaluation Summary
- Pricing upon request
- 14-day free trial
Why Trust Our Software Recommendations
Our team has been testing and reviewing software since 2012. As project managers ourselves, we know how difficult—and important—it is to choose the right software.
For this guide, we evaluated tools using hands-on testing and independent research, scoring tools using our selection criteria. We also draw on insights from industry thought leaders and practicing project management experts.
Our reviews reflect our human editorial judgment, not a sales pitch.
Expert reviewers:
Acuity PPM Overview
Acuity PPM is a strong choice for mid-sized PMOs outgrowing spreadsheets: it ties together intake, weighted prioritization, roadmaps, capacity planning, financials, risk, and project scheduling. Compared with task-focused platforms, it gives leaders clearer portfolio trade-offs, and Crystal AI drafts scores, risks, and reports for people to approve. Pricing is on request, with named-user licenses, no per-resource fees, and 250 included Reader licenses. The interface is approachable, and Acuity handles data loading, configuration, and training.
pros
-
Portfolio dashboards consolidate priorities, risks, schedules, financials, and capacity.
-
Capacity heatmaps expose over-allocation, including time lost to non-project work.
-
Weighted scoring of value and risk ties proposed work to strategic goals.
cons
-
Some Crystal AI capabilities are still on the roadmap rather than live.
-
Complex schedules become harder to manage as portfolios grow.
-
Native connectors are fewer than broad work management suites offer.
-
Smartsheet
Visit WebsiteThis rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.4.4 -
Celoxis
Visit WebsiteThis rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.4.5 -
Accelo
Visit WebsiteThis rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.4.4
Our Review Methodology
How We Test & Score Tools
We’ve spent years building, refining, and improving our software testing and scoring system. The rubric is designed to capture the nuances of software selection and what makes a tool effective, focusing on critical aspects of the decision-making process.
Below, you can see exactly how our testing and scoring works across seven criteria. It allows us to provide an unbiased evaluation of the software based on core functionality, standout features, ease of use, onboarding, customer support, integrations, customer reviews, and value for money.
Core Functionality (25% of final scoring)
The starting point of our evaluation is always the core functionality of the tool. Does it have the basic features and functions that a user would expect to see? Are any of those core features locked to higher-tiered pricing plans? At its core, we expect a tool to stand up against the baseline capabilities of its competitors.
Standout Features (25% of final scoring)
Next, we evaluate uncommon standout features that go above and beyond the core functionality typically found in tools of its kind. A high score reflects specialized or unique features that make the product faster, more efficient, or offer additional value to the user.
We also evaluate how easy it is to integrate with other tools typically found in the tech stack to expand the functionality and utility of the software. Tools offering plentiful native integrations, 3rd party connections, and API access to build custom integrations score best.
Ease of Use (10% of final scoring)
We consider how quick and easy it is to execute the tasks defined in the core functionality using the tool. High scoring software is well designed, intuitive to use, offers mobile apps, provides templates, and makes relatively complex tasks seem simple.
Onboarding (10% of final scoring)
We know how important rapid team adoption is for a new platform, so we evaluate how easy it is to learn and use a tool with minimal training. We evaluate how quickly a team member can get set up and start using the tool with no experience. High scoring solutions indicate little or no support is required.
Customer Support (10% of final scoring)
We review how quick and easy it is to get unstuck and find help by phone, live chat, or knowledge base. Tools and companies that provide real-time support score best, while chatbots score worst.
Customer Reviews (10% of final scoring)
Beyond our own testing and evaluation, we consider the net promoter score from current and past customers. We review their likelihood, given the option, to choose the tool again for the core functionality. A high scoring software reflects a high net promoter score from current or past customers.
Value for Money (10% of final scoring)
Lastly, in consideration of all the other criteria, we review the average price of entry level plans against the core features and consider the value of the other evaluation criteria. Software that delivers more, for less, will score higher.
Core Features
Work Intake And Approvals
Capture requests through configurable intake forms, route them through multi-step approvals and phase gates, and turn approved proposals into projects automatically. Sponsors can sign off from email links, which keeps reviews moving when you compare new product requests before committing team capacity.
Strategic Prioritization
Score proposals against weighted value and risk criteria tied to your strategy, then review a live priority ranking and risk-value bubble chart. Those comparisons explain why one initiative moves ahead of another when budgets or delivery capacity are limited.
Portfolio Roadmaps
Build roadmaps that show initiative timing, sequencing, dependencies, and milestones across the portfolio, then zoom between strategic and near-term views. On Enterprise, you can save alternative scenarios and compare their cost, priority, and return before changing the active plan.
Resource Capacity Planning
Compare demand with capacity by person, role, or team, starting with generic roles and naming people later. Non-project time such as support and leave is factored in, and a heatmap can show when several projects rely on the same engineering role.
Project Delivery And Risk
Manage delivery with Gantt schedules, baselines, and critical path, or import Microsoft Project files. Status reports, RAID and decision logs, and earned value tie delivery details to portfolio risk views, so leaders see when one project issue could affect other work.
Portfolio Reporting And Analytics
Use configurable dashboards and stoplight status reports to review portfolio health, financials, benefits, risk, and delivery. Budgets, forecasts, and actuals roll up across capital and operating spend, and reports export to PowerPoint or Excel for leadership reviews.
Ease of Use
I’d call Acuity PPM more approachable than many portfolio tools, with clear navigation and a focused submission view that keeps casual requesters out of the full portfolio, though it still takes setup to model intake, scoring, and capacity. Once configured, dashboards, the live priority ranking, and capacity heatmaps make trade-offs easier to review, and the interface supports several languages. Usability can dip as portfolios grow, since complex schedules become harder to manage.
Integrations
Acuity PPM integrates natively with Jira, Power BI, and Microsoft Teams, with SSO through Entra ID, Okta, and other SAML or OIDC providers. A REST API, webhooks, and Microsoft Project, Excel, and CSV imports cover the rest, and an Azure DevOps connector is coming soon.
Acuity PPM Specs
- API
- Batch Permissions & Access
- Calendar Management
- Collaboration Support
- Contact Management
- Contact Sharing
- CRM Integration
- Customer Management
- Data Export
- Data Import
- Database
- Email Integration
- File Transfer
- Google Apps Integration
- Multi-Account
- Multi-App
- Multi-Site
- Multi-User
- Password & Access Management
- Project Management
- Report & Compliance
- Resource Management
- Social-Media Integration
- Software Integration
- Task Scheduling/Tracking
- Timesheets
- Workflow Management
Alternatives to Acuity PPM
Acuity PPM FAQs
Can Acuity PPM work alongside our existing project delivery tools?
What security controls and compliance information should we review before buying?
Can Acuity PPM track intake decisions and approval history?
How does Acuity PPM handle customer data used with AI features?
What should we check in Acuity PPM’s subscription terms?
Can we retrieve our portfolio data if we leave Acuity PPM?
Can separate departments use different portfolio workflows?
What's Next?
Want to connect with other digital project managers to share resources and best practices? Join our membership community and get access to 100+ templates, samples, and examples and connect with 100s of other digital project managers in Slack.
