Resource Leveling Vs Resource Smoothing: Key Differences
Use Both Techniques In Your Resourcing Strategy: Resource leveling and smoothing are both viable options for scheduling (and rescheduling) project activities, and you should make use of both throughout your projects.
Resource Leveling Affects The Timeline: Leveling helps address resource constraints by rescheduling activities to when those specific resources are available, which can change your project timeline.
Resource Smoothing Uses Slack In The Timeline: Smoothing also address resource constraints by rescheduling activities, but this happens within the project's 'float' or 'slack,' in order to keep the project timeline intact.
Resource leveling and resource smoothing are both used to address resource constraints on projects, but the main difference is that resource leveling can affect the project timeline and resource smoothing leaves the timeline intact.
By using these resource management techniques, you’re going to get a much better outcome on your project, as well as keep your team happier and better engaged.
Resource management software can help you with either technique, and can often automatically complete manual activities like scheduling and assigning work.
What Is Resource Leveling?
Resource leveling is a technique used to address resource constraints by adjusting the project schedule.
It involves redistributing tasks to ensure that no resource is over-allocated. This may result in extending the critical path and/or project's duration, as tasks are rescheduled to fit within the available resource capacity.
Resource leveling techniques are typically used when resources are limited, and the primary goal is to optimize their utilization without exceeding their availability.
Advantages
- Prevents overallocation of resources
- Helps in managing limited resources effectively
- Improves work-life balance for team members
Disadvantages
- May affect the critical path and extend the project timeline
- Can lead to underutilization of resources at times
- Might require frequent adjustments to the schedule
What Is Resource Smoothing?
Resource smoothing, on the other hand, is applied to projects that are already resource-leveled and/or the timeline is fixed. It seeks to balance resource utilization without extending the project duration.
The aim is to level out resource usage to avoid peaks and troughs, within the constraints of the project schedule. Unlike resource leveling, resource smoothing does not alter the project's end date; it only redistributes tasks within the available slack.
Advantages
- Maintains a steady workload for resources
- Optimizes resource utilization without affecting the project timeline
- Reduces the need for overtime and the associated costs
Disadvantages
- Limited flexibility, as it cannot extend the project duration
- May not be feasible if there is little to no slack in the schedule
- Can result in underutilization of resources during non-peak periods
Resource Leveling Vs Resource Smoothing: Differences & Similarities
The primary distinction between resource leveling and resource smoothing lies in their objectives and impact on the project schedule.
Resource leveling aims to optimize resource allocation with the potential to extend the project duration, while resource smoothing seeks to even out resource usage without changing the finish date.
Resource leveling is more flexible in terms of schedule adjustments, whereas resource smoothing operates within the constraints of the existing timeline.
In terms of effectiveness, resource leveling is more suitable for projects where you can’t add additional resources, while resource smoothing is ideal for projects with a fixed deadline and some schedule flexibility.
Here is a summary of how resource leveling and resource smoothing are different and similar in a few core areas:
| Resource Leveling | Resource Smoothing | Similarities | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose | To ensure no resource is overallocated by adjusting project schedule | To evenly distribute resource usage within a fixed project schedule | Both aim to optimize resource allocation in project management |
| Main Constraint | Resource availability | Project deadline | Both are constrained by project parameters and resource availability |
| Techniques | Rescheduling tasks to fit within resource limits | Adjusting tasks within available slack without changing the project timeline | Both involve redistribution of tasks to better utilize resources |
| Effect on the Critical Path | Can extend the critical path if tasks are delayed | Does not affect the critical path as long as tasks remain within slack | Neither technique should compromise the overall project integrity |
| Impact on Budget | May increase costs due to extended timelines | Generally helps maintain budget control by optimizing within the existing time constraints | Both approaches can influence the project budget through their execution |
| Resource Efficiency | Can lead to periods of underutilization | Aims to maintain consistent resource utilization | Both strategies strive for optimal resource usage but differ in execution |
| Team Morale | Frequent scheduling changes may negatively impact morale | More predictable workload can improve morale | Both methods affect team dynamics and morale in different ways |
| Flexibility in Handling Changes | Offers flexibility to adjust schedules as needed | Less adaptable due to fixed project timelines | Both require strategic management to accommodate changes within project constraints |
| Project Complexity | Better suited for complex projects needing flexible resource management | More effective for simpler projects with less interdependency | Both methods are applicable across various levels of project complexity |
| Resource Allocation Prioritization | Prioritizes critical resources or skills | Maintains an even workload across resources | Both approaches involve strategic decisions on how resources are allocated |
| Risk Management | Mitigates risks like resource burnout and turnover | Reduces risks associated with project delays | Both techniques play a role in overall risk management in projects |
Differences
1. Different Constraints: Resource Availability vs. Project Deadlines
Resource leveling dances to the tune of resource availability. You can use it to flexibly adjust project timelines, stretching them as needed to fit the ebb and flow of team availability or equipment access. This approach suits projects where deadlines can be as fluid as the resources themselves.
On the flip side, resource smoothing plays by the strict rules of the project's fixed deadline. You can move tasks around within the existing schedule’s slack to balance resources without affecting the final deadline.
2. Distinct Purposes: Adapting vs. Optimizing
Resource leveling is perfect for scenarios where resource limitations are a moving target and project timelines can afford some give-and-take. This method ensures resources are not stretched too thin, promoting a healthier, more sustainable workload.
Contrastingly, resource smoothing aims to smooth out bumps in the resource allocation road, keeping the workload even and predictable. It shines in settings where the deadline is sacrosanct but small adjustments within the project’s buffer are permissible.
3. Different Techniques: Shifting Tasks vs. Smoothing Peaks
With resource leveling tasks, might be delayed or responsibilities might be shuffled among team members to cope with resource scarcity. Resource smoothing, however, involves adjusting tasks slightly, nudging them within their allotted slack to maintain an equilibrium of effort across the board.
4. Impact on Milestones: Stretching vs. Preserving Timelines
Resource leveling might extend your project's milestones, pulling out the timeline to fit resource realities. It's about accommodating growth and change, even if it means shifting key dates to keep everything aligned.
Meanwhile, resource smoothing keeps the project’s rhythm unchanged, preserving original milestones while fine-tuning the task distribution.
5. Budget Considerations: Potential Cost Increases vs. Cost Control
Resource leveling may increase project costs due to extended timelines and potential increases in labor or equipment rental durations. This approach might require additional budget considerations as projects may grow longer than initially planned.
Resource smoothing, by maintaining the original project timeline, often helps control costs, preventing budget overruns associated with extended deadlines.
6. Project Complexity: Flexibility vs. Simplicity
For complex projects with many interdependent tasks and fluctuating resource needs, resource leveling offers the necessary flexibility to adjust schedules as the project evolves. It accommodates the intricacies of managing multiple dependencies.
Resource smoothing, meanwhile, is more suited to simpler projects where tasks are less interdependent, allowing for smooth progress within a rigid timeline.
7. Resource Efficiency: Balancing vs. Optimizing
Resource leveling often results in a balancing act, where tasks are shifted around to ensure that no resource is overwhelmed or underutilized, which can sometimes lead to less than optimal use of resources during certain phases of the project.
In contrast, resource smoothing aims to optimize resource usage, maintaining a steady level of utilization throughout the project. This constant rate of resource use helps avoid the pitfalls of both resource idleness and overload, enhancing overall efficiency.
8. Team Morale: Managing Changes vs. Ensuring Predictability
Frequent adjustments in project schedules due to resource leveling can affect team morale, as team members need to constantly adapt to changing tasks and timelines. This can create a sense of instability and unpredictability.
Resource smoothing, however, provides a more predictable and consistent workload. Knowing what to expect and when can make a significant difference in how team members perceive their work and their roles within the project.
9. Handling Changes: Adaptable to Needs vs. Constrained by Time
Resource leveling provides a high degree of flexibility, allowing project managers to adapt to changes in resource availability and project demands. This is crucial in environments where change is frequent and expected.
Resource smoothing, while less flexible in terms of schedule adjustments, offers a method to manage resource allocation within the fixed constraints of the project’s timeline, making it suitable for environments where deadlines are critical and must be met without fail.
10. Risk Management: Reducing Overload Risks vs. Minimizing Delay Risks
Resource leveling effectively reduces the risks associated with resource overload and personnel burnout by ensuring that no resource is overallocated. This approach is particularly beneficial for long-term projects where sustainability and team well-being are priorities.
Resource smoothing, conversely, focuses on minimizing the risks of project delays. By evenly distributing work within the available slack, it helps ensure that the project remains on track to meet its deadlines, which is crucial for projects with tight schedules and high stakes.
11. Prioritization of Resource Allocation: Critical Needs vs. Even Distribution
In resource leveling, critical needs and key resources are prioritized. Project managers allocate the best available resources to the most critical tasks, so that essential aspects of the project are not compromised.
Resource smoothing aims for an even distribution of workloads, prioritizing a balanced approach over the entire project duration. This strategy helps prevent any single resource from becoming a bottleneck, which makes project execution smoother.
Similarities
1. Optimize Resource Allocation
Despite their differences, both resource leveling and resource smoothing share the core goal of optimizing resource allocation within project management. They help you make sure resources are utilized efficiently, minimize waste, and boost the team’s productivity.
2. Operate Within Defined Project Constraints
Both strategies acknowledge and operate within the project constraints—be it resource availability for leveling or timeline rigidity for smoothing.
3. Involve Redistribution of Tasks to Better Utilize Resources
Both methods involve the strategic redistribution of tasks. This reallocation helps you maximize resource usage and avoid periods of excessive workload or idle time for the team.
4. Influence Project Milestones
Both methods have the potential to influence project milestones, albeit in different ways. Resource leveling might shift milestones due to changes in the project timeline, whereas resource smoothing works to meet existing milestones by managing resources within the fixed deadlines.
5. Impact the Project Budget
Resource management techniques like leveling and smoothing can have significant impacts on the project budget. While resource leveling might increase costs due to extended timelines, resource smoothing could potentially avoid additional costs by adhering to the original timeline.
6. Address Project Complexity
Both resource optimization techniques provide frameworks to handle varying degrees of project complexity, task interdependencies, and resource requirements.
7. Improve Team Morale
By optimizing resource management on your projects, you can improve team morale, prevent burnout, and make sure each team member’s workload is manageable. Both approaches aim to create a supportive work environment conducive to high productivity and job satisfaction.
8. Offer Flexibility in Handling Changes
Though resource leveling provides more direct flexibility in response to changes, resource smoothing also offers a structured way to handle minor shifts within constraints.
Both resource allocation methods help you adapt to changes in project dynamics or external conditions.
9. Risk Management
Each method helps mitigate different types of risks—overallocation and burnout with leveling, delays and inefficiencies with smoothing—ensuring the project progresses smoothly towards its objectives.
10. Involve Strategic Decisions on Resource Allocation
Finally, both methods involve making strategic decisions about how to allocate and utilize resources throughout the project. These decisions help you make sure the project achieves its goals efficiently and effectively.
An Example: Application Of Resource Leveling And Smoothing
Consider a software development project with a tight deadline. You might initially employ resource smoothing to distribute tasks evenly so that developers have a consistent workload.
However, as the project progresses, it becomes clear that some critical tasks require specialized skills that are in short supply. You can decide to switch to resource leveling and redistribute tasks to accommodate the availability of key resources, even if it means extending the project timeline slightly.
Is Resource Leveling Or Resource Smoothing More Useful?
It depends on the specific requirements and constraints of a project. Both resource leveling and resource smoothing offer unique advantages and are suited to different project scenarios.
Resource leveling is best for projects where timelines can be adjusted and resource availability is a major concern, while resource smoothing is ideal for projects with fixed deadlines and the goal of maintaining a steady pace of work.
You should consider the unique resource demands and constraints of your projects before choosing the method that will best achieve your goals (and remember to articulate any of this in the project management plan).
Join For More Project Management Techniques And Insights
Want to connect with other digital project managers to share resources and best practices? Join our membership community and get access to 100+ templates, samples, and examples and connect with 100s of other digital project managers in Slack.
