Skip to main content

Choosing the right open source digital asset management software can be challenging, given the variety available. Open source options offer a centralized solution for managing and sharing digital files. They are adaptable to specific needs and cost-effective, addressing issues like disorganized storage, access difficulties, and content control. Here are my picks for the best open source digital asset management software.

Why Trust Our Software Reviews

We’ve been testing and reviewing open source digital asset management software since 2012. As project managers ourselves, we know how critical and difficult it is to make the right decision when selecting software. 

We invest in deep research to help our audience make better software purchasing decisions. We’ve tested more than 2,000 tools for different project management use cases and written over 1,000 comprehensive software reviews. Learn how we stay transparent & our software review methodology

How to Choose Open Source Digital Asset Management Software

As you work through your own unique software selection process, keep the following points in mind:

  • Feature Set: Ensure the software has the necessary features to meet your specific needs. For instance, if your organization requires advanced search capabilities to handle a large volume of assets, the software should offer robust search functions and filtering options. This is particularly relevant for industries with extensive media libraries that need quick retrieval.
  • Scalability: Consider whether the software can grow with your organization. If you anticipate an increase in digital assets, the chosen solution should be able to handle this growth without performance issues. This is crucial for startups or businesses amid expansion that expect their asset libraries to grow rapidly.
  • Community Support: Evaluate the strength and activity of the software's community. A vibrant community can provide valuable support, plugins, and updates. This is important for organizations that lack extensive IT resources and rely on community support for troubleshooting and enhancements.
  • Integration Capabilities: Check if the software can integrate with your existing systems. Seamless integration with other tools and platforms is essential for a smooth workflow, especially for companies that use a variety of software systems and need to ensure compatibility and data exchange between them.
  • Security Features: Assess the security measures provided by the software. Open source solutions should have strong security protocols to protect your digital assets. This is a significant concern for industries that handle sensitive information, such as healthcare or finance, where data breaches can have serious implications.

Best Open Source Digital Asset Management Software Reviews

Here is my comprehensive review of open source digital asset management tools, detailing their strengths, weaknesses, and the scenarios they are best suited for.

Best for enterprise digital transformation

  • 3-months reduced cost trial
  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.4/5

Pimcore's complete toolset makes it the best choice for enabling enterprise digital transformation.

Why I Picked Pimcore:

I chose Pimcore for the list because it stands out as a robust and flexible digital asset management platform that centralizes all media assets. Its ability to integrate, consolidate, and manage any type and amount of digital assets makes it a powerful tool for enterprises. I think Pimcore is best for enterprise digital transformation because it provides a solid structure for reusing digital assets, optimizing data dissemination, and content search processes, while offering high performance and scalability.

Standout features & integrations:

Pimcore's most important features include a centralized repository for digital assets and metadata, advanced workflow management, and support for 220+ file formats for previewing, collaborating, transforming, and publishing. It also offers automatic conversion and transcoding for image and video files, ensuring that assets are available in any resolution and format required. 

Pimcore integrates natively with Microsoft Office, Adobe Creative Cloud, Shopify, NetSuite, Drupal, and Salesforce Marketing Cloud.

Pros and cons


  • Advanced workflow management for defining business processes
  • Supports a wide range of file formats
  • Centralizes all media assets for easy management


  • Specific native integration partners are not listed in the provided documents
  • The complexity of features may require a steeper learning curve for new users
  • Pricing information is not readily available and requires direct inquiry

Best for integration capabilities

  • Free Use
  • Pricing upon request

AtroDam provides solutions for efficiently organizing, storing, and sharing digital materials through a unified platform.

Why I Picked AtroDAM:

I selected AtroDAM for its open-source flexibility and its strong integration capabilities, which are essential for businesses that use multiple systems. I believe AtroDAM to be best for integration capabilities because it facilitates automated data exchange with third-party systems, which simplifies managing digital assets across different platforms.

Standout features & integrations:

AtroDAM offers features such as mass uploads, management of various asset types, and metadata management. It ensures assets and their derivatives are readily available for quick download in the required format and size. 

AtroDAM can be integrated with AtroPIM – Product Information Management System.

Pros and cons


  • Strong integration with AtroPIM and other systems
  • Configurable data model and taxonomies
  • Open-source with GPLv3 license


  • Potential need for technical expertise for setup and customization
  • Non-transparent pricing for additional services and modules
  • Lack of a specific list of integration tools on the website

Best for AI-driven DAM

  • Pricing upon request

Daminion Standalone Basic is recognized as the best for AI-driven digital asset management due to its advanced AI capabilities that streamline asset organization and retrieval.

Why I Picked Daminion Standalone Basic:

I chose Daminion Standalone Basic for this list because of its robust AI features that significantly enhance the efficiency of managing digital assets. Its AI-driven tools are a game-changer for businesses looking to automate and optimize their digital asset management processes. I believe it is best for AI-driven DAM because it leverages artificial intelligence to provide smart tagging, facial recognition, and object recognition, which simplifies the categorization and searching of vast media libraries.

Standout features & integrations:

Daminion Standalone Basic offers a comprehensive set of features that cater to the needs of modern digital asset management. It supports over 100 media formats, provides hierarchical tags for better organization, and includes advanced search capabilities with AND/OR/NOT operands. The system also offers version control, workflow automation, and granular access permissions, ensuring secure collaboration and efficient management of digital assets.

Integrations include Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, Adobe InDesign, MS Office, CMS, CRM, and more.

Pros and cons


  • Advanced search capabilities with logical operands for precise filtering
  • Supports a wide range of media formats for comprehensive asset management
  • AI-driven features for automated tagging and organization


  • The complexity of features may require a learning curve for new users
  • May require technical expertise for customization
  • Pricing information is not directly available and must be requested

Best for small businesses

  • From $80/user/month (billed annually).

Razuna offers a platform for storing, organizing, and sharing multimedia data among multiple devices and users.

Why I Picked Razuna DAM:

I selected Razuna for its straightforward approach to digital asset management, which is particularly beneficial for small businesses. Its pricing model is innovative, eliminating per-user fees, which often pose a barrier for small companies. I believe Razuna is best for small businesses as it provides an affordable and scalable solution, allowing these companies to manage their digital assets effectively without financial strain.

Standout features & integrations:

Razuna offers an intuitive interface, quick search functionality, and organized file management. It ensures secure management of brand assets, with controlled access and rights management. The platform supports team collaboration with a comprehensive commenting system, suitable for businesses of varying sizes.

Razuna integrates with Drupal, Apideck, Helpmonks, and GitHub.

Pros and cons


  • Versatile digital asset management features
  • Free plan available with substantial storage for up to 5 users
  • No per-user fees, cost-effective for small businesses


  • Some advanced features like image & video editing and API access are not yet available
  • Lack of specific native integration information on the website
  • Significant price increase from free to the next tier

Best for digital content preservation

  • Pricing upon request

Islandora is an open-source digital asset management software that offers flexible data storage and robust preservation features, supporting a variety of digital content types ideal for academic institutions and libraries to manage and access their collections.

Why I Picked Islandora:

I chose Islandora for its robust integration with Drupal and its strong community support. It stands out for its flexibility and powerful content management capabilities. I believe it is best for digital content preservation because of its integration with Fedora Commons, which is essential for long-term digital content stewardship.

Standout features & integrations:

Islandora offers Drupal-powered modules for adaptable content management and Apache Solr for advanced indexing and querying. It supports IIIF for scalable access to digital objects, highlighting its commitment to open standards.

Islandora integrates natively with Drupal, Apache Solr, Fedora Commons, IIIF, and more.

Pros and cons


  • Flexible and powerful CMS integration
  • Strong community support
  • Open-source framework


  • Preservation features may require additional integration
  • Technical expertise required for customization
  • May incur hosting and support costs

Best for green energy commitment

  • Free demo available
  • From $21/user/month (billed annually)

HyperCMS offers capabilities for managing, editing, and sharing digital material over many channels. It stands out for organizations prioritizing green energy, as it helps reduce the carbon footprint of digital asset management.

Why I Picked HyperCMS:

I selected HyperCMS for its robust feature set that aids in the effective management of digital content. Its dedication to green energy initiatives distinguishes it from others, making it an ideal choice for eco-conscious organizations. I believe HyperCMS is the best for green energy commitment because it offers an energy-efficient approach to managing digital assets, potentially lowering the energy use tied to digital storage and distribution.

Standout features & integrations:

HyperCMS boasts a user-friendly interface, inline editing capabilities, and support for multiple languages. It provides a centralized hub for data with advanced search functions and customizable metadata schemes. The platform facilitates video and audio file editing, the creation of interactive videos, and image processing. 

The tool integrates with Adobe Creative Cloud, Microsoft Office, Adobe CS, and OpenOffice.

Pros and cons


  • Focus on green energy practices
  • Comprehensive content management and digital asset management features
  • Intuitive interface for managing complex data structures


  • Limited details on native integrations with other platforms
  • Additional module costs based on storage requirements
  • Pricing in Euros, which may necessitate conversion for users outside the Eurozone

Best for media collaboration

  • From $299 per month (billed annually)

EnterMedia provides powerful capabilities for corporations looking for effective solutions to manage large amounts of multimedia information while improving accessibility and collaboration.

Why I Picked EnterMedia:

I chose EnterMedia for its robust media collaboration capabilities, which are essential for modern organizations that rely on shared digital assets. Its open-source nature allows for flexibility and customization, which is a standout feature compared to other digital asset management software. I believe EnterMedia is best for media collaboration due to its comprehensive set of tools designed to enhance teamwork and streamline the management of digital content.

Standout features & integrations:

EnterMediaDB offers a range of features including library management, corporate integration, and upcoming artificial intelligence capabilities for automatic tagging and transcription. 

EnterMediaDB integrates natively with AdsPower, Adobe Bride, and Drupal.

Pros and cons


  • Free trial and version available for evaluation
  • Comprehensive media collaboration tools
  • Open-source platform allows for extensive customization


  • Docker deployment is not officially supported
  • Customization may require additional support
  • The steep learning curve for administration

Best for open-source DAM

  • Phraseanet is open source and can be downloaded and used for free.

Phraseanet is recognized as the best open-source DAM due to its extensive features and adaptability for professional use.

Why I Picked Phraseanet:

I chose Phraseanet for this list because of its robust set of features that cater to a wide range of professional needs. Its open-source nature allows for extensive customization and control, which is essential for organizations looking to tailor their DAM systems. I believe Phraseanet is best for open-source DAM because it provides a complete system for managing, publishing, and sharing digital media resources, which is crucial for institutions that require full ownership and customization capabilities.

Standout features & integrations:

Phraseanet offers a multitude of features, including document uploading with quarantine for duplicates and non-compliant files, management of digital assets with Elasticsearch for full-text and thesaurus searches, and publishing tools for customer sites and social networks. It also provides administration capabilities for creating databases, managing user rights, and a thesaurus for term management. 

Phraseanet’s integrations include WordPress, Drupal, Adobe, Zapier and Wufoo.

Pros and cons


  • Supports a wide range of document formats and offers an API and development kit for integrations
  • Comprehensive feature set for managing, publishing, and sharing digital assets
  • Open-source and fully customizable


  • The need for self-hosting could be a barrier for organizations without IT infrastructure
  • Open-source nature means less direct support compared to commercial products
  • May require technical expertise to customize and integrate with other systems

Best for multi-channel campaigns

  • ResourceSpace is free to use.

ResourceSpace excels in multi-channel campaigns, offering robust support for various media types and distribution channels.

Why I Picked ResourceSpace:

I selected ResourceSpace for its ability to handle digital assets across multiple channels and its open-source framework that allows for significant customization, setting it apart from other digital asset management tools. I consider ResourceSpace best for multi-channel campaigns as it provides users with the necessary tools to efficiently organize, manage, and distribute assets across various platforms and media formats.

Standout features & integrations:

ResourceSpace is equipped with features such as advanced search, workflow and version control, and customizable access permissions. 

Resource Space integrates natively with ADFS, Shibboleth, OpenAM, A-Select, CAS, OpenID, WS-Federation, OAuth, PingFederate, Adobe, WordPress, Google Cloud, and Vision AI.

Pros and cons


  • Provides a free tier with 10GB of storage and support for up to 10 users
  • Applicable across various industries, including marketing, education, non-profits, and cultural sectors
  • Open-source platform enabling significant customization


  • Limited information on security protocols and compliance certifications
  • Absence of a comprehensive list of native integrations
  • Lack of detailed pricing for advanced plans and extra storage options

Best for complex enterprise applications

  • From $200,000 per year (billed annually).

Nuxeo DAM excels in handling large volumes of digital assets across various file formats and integrates with existing enterprise systems.

Why I Picked Nuxeo DAM:

I chose Nuxeo DAM for its robust capabilities in managing extensive digital asset collections within complex enterprise environments. Its adaptability and integration capacity make it a standout choice for organizations that require a sophisticated digital asset management solution. I believe Nuxeo DAM is best for complex enterprise applications because of its ability to mold intricate business processes and its proficiency in integrating with a multitude of enterprise applications.

Standout features & integrations:

Nuxeo DAM is notable for its cloud-native platform, low-code approach, and AI capabilities that enhance process automation. It supports a wide range of asset types and offers configurable workflows through flexible content and data models.

Nuxeo DAM integrates natively with Office365, SAP Success Factors, Encompass, Adobe Sign, Ellucian, NextGen, Cerner and more.

Pros and cons


  • AI capabilities enhance process automation
  • The low-code approach reduces need for custom coding
  • The cloud-native platform supports scalability


  • Extensive integration capabilities could necessitate additional setup time
  • May require a learning curve for full utilization
  • The initial cost may be prohibitive for smaller organizations

Other Tools

Here are some other open source digital asset management software options.

  1. OpenBroadcaster

    Best for empowering channels

  2. Concrete CMS

    Best for content management

Selection Criteria For Open Source Digital Asset Management Software

Selecting open-source digital asset management software requires a focus on functionality and the ability to meet specific use cases that are crucial for users. Through personal trials and research, I have established a set of criteria to guide the selection process.

Core Functionality (25% of the total weighting score):

  • Centralized storage for digital assets
  • Access control and permission management
  • Asset searchability and metadata tagging
  • Version control and audit trails
  • Distribution and sharing of digital assets

Additional Standout Features (25% of the total weighting score):

  • Innovative integration capabilities with other systems
  • Advanced AI-driven tagging and categorization
  • Customizable workflows for asset approval and release
  • Real-time collaboration tools for editing and feedback
  • Support for various file types and large file handling

Usability (10% of the total weighting score):

  • Intuitive navigation and user-friendly interface design
  • Efficient asset searching, filtering, and tagging systems
  • Balance between powerful features and ease of use
  • Aesthetic appeal of the interface that enhances user engagement

Onboarding (10% of total weighing score):

  • Comprehensive training materials such as videos and templates
  • Interactive product tours and chatbots for immediate assistance
  • Webinars and live training sessions for in-depth learning
  • A straightforward process for importing assets and setting up the system

Customer Support (10% of total weighting score):

  • Availability of support channels (email, phone, live chat)
  • Responsiveness and resolution times of the support team
  • Access to a knowledge base or community forums for self-help
  • Quality of technical assistance and problem-solving capabilities

Value For Money (10% of total weighing score):

  • Transparent and competitive pricing structures
  • Cost-effectiveness compared to the range of features offered
  • Flexibility of pricing plans to suit different organizational sizes
  • Free version or trial availability to test the software before purchase

Customer Reviews (10% of total weighing score):

  • Overall satisfaction ratings from current and past users
  • Feedback on software reliability and performance
  • User testimonials about the impact on their workflow and productivity
  • Consistency of positive reviews over time indicating software stability and improvement

Here are some current and interesting trends I'm noticing in open-source digital asset management software technology. 

  1. Integration with Cloud Storage Solutions: Open-source DAM systems are increasingly integrating with cloud storage services. This trend allows for scalable storage options and remote access to assets. It is important as it supports collaboration across geographically dispersed teams.
  2. Adoption of AI and Machine Learning: Artificial intelligence and machine learning are being incorporated into open-source DAM software. These technologies automate metadata tagging and image recognition, improving searchability and organization. This is significant for efficiency and accuracy in managing large asset libraries.
  3. Enhanced Security Features: Security is a growing focus for open-source DAM solutions. Developers are implementing advanced encryption and permission controls to protect digital assets. This trend is crucial for maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of sensitive materials.
  4. User Experience Improvements: There is a push towards improving the user interface and experience of open-source DAM software. Simplified navigation and customizable dashboards are becoming more common. This is interesting as it aims to make DAM systems more accessible and user-friendly.
  5. Expansion of Analytics Capabilities: Analytics features are being expanded in open-source DAM platforms. These enhancements provide insights into asset usage and user engagement. The importance lies in enabling data-driven decisions for content strategy and asset management.

What Is Open Source Digital Asset Management Software?

Open source digital asset management software is a platform designed to store, organize, and retrieve media files such as photos, videos, audio files, and documents. It is used by organizations and individuals who manage large volumes of digital content, enabling them to easily access and share assets while maintaining control over their use.

The software typically includes features for cataloging assets, assigning metadata, managing permissions, and integrating with other systems. Users benefit from the ability to track and manage digital assets throughout their lifecycle, from creation to archiving or deletion.

Features Of Open Source Digital Asset Management Software

When selecting open source digital asset management software, it's crucial to consider the features that will best support your organization's needs for managing and distributing digital assets effectively. Here are some key features to look for:

  1. Asset Organization: This feature allows for categorizing and tagging assets for easy retrieval. Proper asset organization ensures that users can find the right files quickly, which is essential for maintaining productivity.
  2. Version Control: This feature keeps track of changes to assets over time. Version control is important because it allows for the restoration of previous versions if necessary and helps maintain the integrity of your assets.
  3. Access Controls: This feature manages user permissions for accessing certain assets. Access controls are critical for maintaining the security of your digital assets and ensuring that only authorized personnel can access sensitive information.
  4. Metadata Management: This feature involves tagging assets with information for easy searching and sorting. Metadata management is crucial for the discoverability of assets, allowing users to filter and locate files based on specific criteria.
  5. Support for Various File Types: This feature ensures compatibility with a wide range of digital asset formats. Support for various file types is important to accommodate the diverse range of media that organizations typically use.
  6. Integration Capabilities: This feature allows the software to work with other systems and software. Integration capabilities are important for ensuring that the digital asset management system can connect with existing workflows and tools.
  7. Search Functionality: This feature provides robust search tools to locate assets quickly. Effective search functionality is essential for saving time and reducing frustration when trying to locate specific files.
  8. Reporting and Analytics: This feature offers insights into how assets are being used. Reporting and analytics are important for understanding user engagement and optimizing the management of digital assets.
  9. Backup and Recovery: This feature ensures that there are procedures in place to recover lost or corrupted assets. Backup and recovery are critical for protecting assets against data loss and ensuring business continuity.
  10. User-Friendly Interface: This feature refers to the ease of use of the software. A user-friendly interface is important because it reduces the learning curve for new users and helps them to be more efficient in their tasks.
  11. Product information management (PIM): Ability to label digital assets with data and metadata that helps to identify and sort them according to your needs. 

Benefits Of Open Source Digital Asset Management Software

Open-source digital asset management (DAM) software offers a range of advantages for organizations looking to manage their digital content effectively. Here are five primary benefits that potential buyers should consider:

  1. Cost-Effectiveness: Open source DAM software can be more cost-effective than proprietary solutions, often eliminating licensing fees and reducing storage costs, making it an economical choice for managing digital assets.
  2. Customization and Flexibility: Users can tailor open source DAM software to their specific needs, thanks to the ability to modify the source code, adjust features, and integrate with other systems, ensuring a perfect fit for their organizational processes.
  3. Scalability: Open source DAM software can grow with an organization, providing scalable solutions for managing an increasing volume of digital assets without compromising on performance.
  4. Innovation and Collaboration: The collaborative nature of open-source DAM software development leads to innovative features and rapid enhancements, as a community of contributors works together to improve the platform.
  5. Security and Control: Greater visibility into the source code of open-source DAM software allows organizations to conduct comprehensive security reviews and maintain high-security standards, contributing to a more secure DAM environment.

For organizations considering their options, open-source digital asset management software presents a compelling choice with its blend of affordability, adaptability, and collaborative innovation. 

Costs And Pricing Of Open Source Digital Asset Management Software

Choosing the right open-source digital asset management software offers a cost-effective and flexible way to manage digital assets like images, videos, and documents. These solutions are especially suitable for those new to DAM software, thanks to their typically lower cost and community-driven support. These plans often vary in terms of features, support levels, and customization options, making it essential for software buyers to carefully assess their specific needs against what each plan offers.

Plan TypeAverage PriceCommon Features
Free$0 (Free)- 10GB free storage- No expiry, no restrictions- Maximum 10 users- Self-help using knowledge base
Team CloudFrom $400.89/month- Up to 50 users- Training for up to two admin- 20 trees planted annually- 1TB to 9TB storage options
Business CloudFrom 902.32/month- Unlimited users- Training for up to four admin- 40 trees planted annually- 3TB to 25TB storage options- Single Sign On (SSO) configured- API access
Enterprise CloudFrom $1597/month- Unlimited users- Training sessions for groups of up to six- 100 trees planted annually- 8TB to 100+ TB storage options- Priority support- Separate supported test instance
On PremiseFrom $635/month- Installation to own server/VM- Unlimited users- Training for up to two admin- 20 trees planted annually
On Premise EnterpriseFrom $1025/month- Installation to own server(s)/VM(s)- Unlimited users- Training sessions for advanced features- 40 trees planted annually- SSO configured

When considering which plan to choose, software buyers should consider the size of their organization, the volume of digital assets they need to manage, and the level of support and training they require. It's also important to consider the potential growth of the organization and choose a plan that can scale accordingly.

Open Source Digital Asset Management Software FAQs

Here are some of the frequently asked questions I get asked about open source digital asset management software.

What are the limitations of open source DAM systems?

While open source DAM systems offer many benefits, they also come with certain limitations. Security concerns can arise since the code is publicly accessible, potentially exposing vulnerabilities. Open source DAMs may lack personalized support and service teams, which can be challenging for organizations without technical expertise. Usability may also be an issue, as open source solutions are often developed with a focus on functionality rather than user experience, making them less intuitive for non-technical users.

How does open source DAM compare to proprietary DAM software?

Open source DAM software differs from proprietary DAM in that it allows users to see and modify the source code, offering greater flexibility and customization. Proprietary DAM software, on the other hand, is closed-source, with customizations and features controlled by the vendor. While open source DAM can be more cost-effective and adaptable, proprietary solutions may offer better usability, dedicated support, and potentially more robust security measures.

Is open source DAM software suitable for large enterprises?

Open source DAM software can be suitable for large enterprises, especially those that require a high degree of customization and have the technical resources to manage and maintain the software. Large enterprises can benefit from the scalability and flexibility of open-source DAM to handle vast amounts of digital assets and complex asset management needs.

What kind of support is available for open source DAM software?

Support for open-source DAM software typically comes from the community of developers and users who contribute to the project. This can include forums, wikis, and other collaborative platforms where users can seek help, share knowledge, and find solutions to common problems. However, unlike proprietary software, open-source DAM may not offer direct support from a dedicated service team.

How can I customize open source DAM software to fit my needs?

Most open source DAM solutions allow you to modify the code or add plugins. Start by identifying your specific needs, then explore the community forums or documentation for customization tips.

What should I consider when choosing open source DAM software?

Assess the software’s support for various media types, its user community’s activity for obtaining help and updates, and whether it integrates well with your existing tools.

What Next?

Want to connect with other digital project managers to share resources and best practices? Join our membership community and get access to 100+ templates, samples, and examples and connect with 100s of other digital project managers in Slack.

By Hermann Fink

Hermann Fink is a technology enthusiast and the co-founder of Rünna Advertising, a multinational digital agency that has been active for over a decade and served clients like Ford, AstraZeneca, Disney, and Didi. In addition to being a business owner, Hermann gathered corporate experience in project management during his time at Hewlett Packard in the mid-2010s.