Skip to main content

If you’ve been using InVision for your design projects, you might be wondering if there are better options out there. Maybe you’re looking for more features, better pricing, or something that integrates more smoothly with your workflow. Whatever the reason, exploring alternatives can help you find a tool that better suits your team's needs and enhances your overall productivity.

After testing and reviewing several project management solutions, here are my suggestions for the best InVision alternatives.

What is InVision?

InVision is a digital product design platform utilized primarily by designers to create interactive and responsive prototypes for web and mobile applications. It serves as a collaborative environment where teams can share, review, and test designs. Users include designers, product managers, and developers who need a centralized platform to bring their digital product ideas to life through prototyping and collaboration.

Why Look for an InVision Alternative

While InVision is a valuable design software solution, there are several reasons why you and your team may be considering another alternative, including:

  • Cost concerns: If InVision’s pricing feels too steep for your budget, there are more affordable options on the market that still offer great features.
  • Feature limitations: Sometimes you just need specific functionalities that InVision doesn’t have. Exploring other tools can help you find exactly what you’re looking for.
  • Usability issues: If you find InVision’s user interface tricky to navigate, it might be time to check out alternatives. A more intuitive tool can make your workflow smoother and more enjoyable.
  • Integration needs: It’s frustrating when your tools don’t work well together. Looking for alternatives that integrate better with your existing systems can make a big difference.
  • Support and resources: Good support is important. If you’re seeking more accessible customer service or resources, other options might offer what you need.

Ultimately, finding the right InVision alternative can significantly enhance your design process, making your projects more efficient, collaborative, and enjoyable. By exploring different options, you can discover tools that provide the requirements necessary for you and your team to succeed.

Why Trust Our Software Reviews

We’ve been testing and reviewing project management software since 2012. As digital project managers, we know how critical and difficult it is to make the right decision when selecting software. 

We invest in deep research to help our audience make better software purchasing decisions. We’ve tested more than 2,000 tools for different project management use cases and written over 1,000 comprehensive software reviews. Learn how we stay transparent & our software review methodology.

Best InVision Alternatives Summary

Tools Price
Marvel From $16/user/month (billed annually)
Balsamiq From $9/user/month (billed annually)
UXPin From $6/user/month
Justinmind From $9/user/month
Flinto From $99/user/year (billed annually)
Framer From $5/site/month (billed annually) From $7/user/month From $29/user/month
Zeplin From $8/user/month
Webflow From $14/month (billed annually)
Preview Image - <h2 class="c-block__title b-summary-table__title c-listicle__title h3" > Compare Software Specs Side by Side</h2>

Compare Software Specs Side by Side

Use our comparison chart to review and evaluate software specs side-by-side.

Compare Software

Best InVision Alternatives Reviews

Below, I will provide a detailed analysis and overview of each InVision alternative, discussing their strengths and weaknesses. I’ll also delve into the features of these tools and identify the scenarios where they are most effective.

Best for rapid prototyping and testing

  • 7-day free trial + free plan available
  • From $16/user/month (billed annually)
Visit Website
Rating: 4.4/5

Marvel is a design and prototyping tool used by teams to create and collaborate on user interface designs and interactive prototypes for web and mobile applications. It enables users to design screens, add interactions, and create realistic, clickable prototypes that simulate the user experience without writing any code. 

Why it's a good InVision alternative:

Marvel helps teams accelerate the design validation process with its straightforward interface and direct Sketch integration. Its intuitive drag-and-drop interface and robust collaboration feature make it easy for teams to design and prototype user interfaces efficiently. Additionally, Marvel's usability testing features allow for quick iteration and validation of design concepts, ensuring a user-centered design process.

Standout features & integrations:

Features include prototyping, real-time collaboration, user testing, design handoff, interactive design tools, customizable templates, version history, commenting and feedback, presentation mode, secure sharing, and mobile access.

Integrations include Slack, Jira, Confluence, Dropbox, Google Drive, Sketch, Trello, Microsoft Teams, Zapier, and Box.

Pros and cons


  • Direct integration with Sketch
  • Quick prototyping and user testing capabilities
  • Intuitive interface


  • Performance issues with larger or complex projects
  • Occasional integration difficulties

Best for low-fidelity wireframing

  • 30-day free trial
  • From $9/user/month (billed annually)
Visit Website
Rating: 4.2/5

Balsamiq is a specialized tool for creating low-fidelity wireframes quickly and easily. It's best for low-fidelity wireframing because it simplifies the process, allowing for rapid creation and iteration of wireframes.

Why it's a good InVision alternative:

Balsamiq offers a focused approach to wireframing that is both fast and user-friendly. Its simplicity makes it a strong alternative to InVision, particularly for those who need to produce wireframes without the need for high-fidelity prototypes or advanced interactions.

Standout features & integrations:

Features include low-fidelity wireframing, drag-and-drop interface, pre-built UI components, sketch-style design, interactive linking for creating clickable prototypes, collaboration tools for feedback and comments, version control, export options to PDF and image formats, templates and reusable symbols, user-friendly interface, and support for both web and desktop applications.

Integrations include Confluence, Jira, Google Drive, Box, Dropbox, Slack, Trello, GitHub, GitLab, and Microsoft Teams.

Pros and cons


  • Supports real-time collaboration
  • Simple and intuitive interface
  • Specialized in low-fidelity wireframing


  • Lack of real-time collaboration features
  • Limited to low-fidelity designs

Best for design system consistency

  • 14-day free trial + free plan available
  • From $6/user/month
Visit Website
Rating: 4.2/5

UXPin is a sophisticated platform for UI design and prototyping. It excels in ensuring design system consistency, which is essential for cohesive user interfaces across different platforms and devices.

Why it's a good InVision alternative:

UXPin prioritizes design system consistency, an aspect fundamental for teams aiming to maintain a uniform brand identity and user experience. This focus distinguishes UXPin as a noteworthy alternative to InVision, especially for organizations that value standardized design practices.

Standout features & integrations:

Features include advanced prototyping, real-time collaboration, design systems, interactive states, conditional logic, version control, user testing, accessibility features, commenting and feedback, code components, and secure sharing.

Integrations include Slack, Jira, Microsoft Teams, Storybook, npm, Dropbox, Google Drive, Sketch, GitHub, GitLab, and Zeplin.

Pros and cons


  • Robust integrations with popular tools like Slack, JIRA, and Microsoft Teams
  • Support for conditional logic and variables enhances design versatility
  • Advanced prototyping capabilities with detailed interactions and animations


  • Not suited for all types of teams
  • Annual billing may not be suitable for all budgets

Best for integrated prototyping

  • Free plan available
  • From $9/user/month
Visit Website
Rating: 4/5

Justinmind is a prototyping tool that enables users to create high-fidelity interactive prototypes. It stands out as the best for integrated prototyping due to its valued feature set that supports end-to-end design and prototyping within a single environment.

Why it's a good InVision alternative:

Justinmind offers a detailed and integrated environment for prototyping, which is essential for creating interactive and high-fidelity prototypes. Its ability to handle the entire design process from wireframing to high-fidelity prototyping makes it a strong alternative to InVision.

Standout features & integrations:

Features include pre-built UI kits with over 4000 components, visual design capabilities, adaptive/responsive design tools, smart templates, masters for reusing design elements, rich web interactions, mobile gestures, and transitions, as well as animations and effects to enhance user experience.

Integrations include Jira, Microsoft TFS, Google Drive, Box, Dropbox, GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Trello, and Asana.

Pros and cons


  • Free plan available with essential features
  • Integration with design and user testing tools
  • Comprehensive prototyping features


  • Higher cost for month-to-month billing
  • Steeper learning curve for new users

Best for interactive transitions

  • 14-day free trial
  • From $99/user/year (billed annually)

Flinto is a dedicated tool for creating high-fidelity prototypes with a focus on interactive transitions, making it ideal for designers who want to bring their mobile app interfaces to life.

Why it's a good InVision alternative:

Flinto provides a unique environment for designing sophisticated transitions and micro-interactions. Its advanced animation tools and transition features enable designers to bring their designs to life with smooth, realistic interactions. This focus on interactivity, without the need for coding or timelines, makes Flinto a compelling alternative to InVision for those who want to create detailed and animated prototypes and mockups.

Standout features & integrations:

Features include interactive prototyping, advanced animation tools, gesture-based transitions, customizable micro-interactions, real-time preview, drag-and-drop interface, vector drawing tools, layer-based design, easy sharing options, feedback and commenting, and support for high-fidelity prototypes.

Integrations include Sketch, Figma, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator, Adobe After Effects, Slack, Jira, Dropbox, Google Drive, GitHub, Trello, Asana, and Zeplin.

Pros and cons


  • Real-time preview on iOS devices for immediate feedback
  • Compatibility with Sketch and Figma for design import
  • Specialized tools for creating interactive transitions and micro-interactions


  • Lacks built-in collaboration tools for team projects
  • Exclusively available for Mac, not supporting Windows or Linux users

Best for creative animations

  • 14-day free trial + free plan available
  • From $5/site/month (billed annually)

Framer is a platform for interactive design and prototyping. It’s best for creative animations due to its robust animation features and tools.

Why it's a good InVision alternative:

Framer provides a unique focus on animation and interactivity, which are essential for modern UI/UX design. It combines powerful design and prototyping capabilities with the flexibility of code, allowing designers to create highly interactive and realistic prototypes. With an intuitive interface and real-time collaboration features, Framer helps to enhance team communication and streamline the design process. 

Standout features & integrations:

Features include interactive prototyping, real-time collaboration, design and code integration, advanced animation tools, customizable components, instant preview, responsive design, version control, commenting and feedback, user testing, and secure sharing.

Integrations include Shopify, FramerAuth, Mailchimp, Formspark, Crowdin, Figma, Outline, Microsoft 365, Zoom, and Sketch.

Pros and cons


  • Offers a free trial
  • Integration with third-party services like Shopify
  • Robust animation tools


  • May have a steeper learning curve for new users
  • Requires annual billing

Best for no-code web building

  • 14-day free trial + free plan available
  • From $7/user/month is a no-code builder that simplifies the creation of websites. It's best for no-code web building due to its user-friendly interface and powerful features that require no coding skills.

Why it's a good InVision alternative: stands out as a no-code solution that empowers designers and teams to build websites quickly and efficiently. Its intuitive design tools and real-time collaboration capabilities make it a strong InVision alternative for those who want to streamline their web design process without coding.

Standout features & integrations:

Features include no-code website building, drag-and-drop interface, customizable templates, responsive design, real-time collaboration, built-in SEO tools, secure hosting, e-commerce functionality, analytics and reporting, visual editing tools, and automatic updates.

Integrations include Google Analytics, Mailchimp, PayPal, Stripe, Shopify, Zapier, Trello, Asana, Salesforce, and Slack.

Pros and cons


  • Instant preview features
  • Real-time collaboration
  • Adaptive components for various formats


  • Limited customization options
  • No offline service for editing and collaboration

Best for mobile prototyping

  • 15-day free trial + free demo available
  • From $29/user/month is a powerful tool designed to help designers create fully interactive, high-fidelity prototypes that look and work like real apps. It’s especially effective for simulating the user experience on mobile devices, supporting a wide range of gestures and transitions.

Why I picked has a strong capability to create prototypes that feel almost like the final product, especially for mobile applications. It stands out due to its in-depth support for mobile gestures and animations, which many other prototyping tools lack. This focus makes the best choice for projects where mobile user experience and interaction are priorities.

Standout features & integrations:

Features include a drag-and-drop interface, user interaction simulation, and the ability to test on actual devices which provides a realistic preview of the mobile app. The tool also supports detailed animations and transitions, allowing designers to prototype more complex interactions.

Integrations include Jira, Slack, Dropbox, Google Drive, Sketch, Adobe XD, Lookback, UserTesting, Validately, and Zeplin.

Pros and cons


  • Supports high-fidelity animations and transitions
  • Allows testing prototypes directly on real devices
  • Offers a wide range of mobile gestures and touch interactions


  • Primarily focused on mobile, which can be limiting for those looking to prototype for other platforms
  • Steeper learning curve due to advanced features

Best for design handoff precision

  • Free plan available
  • From $8/user/month

Zeplin is a collaboration tool specifically tailored for the handoff between designers and developers. It helps teams ensure that designs are accurately translated into code, which is critical for maintaining design integrity.

Why it's a good InVision alternative:

Zeplin offers a specialized focus on the design handoff process. This tool is particularly effective for teams that prioritize precision and detail in their design-to-development workflow, setting it apart as a strong alternative to InVision.

Standout features & integrations:

Features include design handoff, real-time collaboration, style guides, component libraries, version control, integration with popular design tools, automated asset generation, commenting and feedback, project organization, export options for various platforms, user permissions, and secure sharing.

Integrations include Slack, Jira, Trello, Microsoft Teams, Adobe XD, Figma, Sketch, and Photoshop.

Pros and cons


  • Supports design system documentation
  • Integrates with popular design and project management tools
  • Dedicated space for design handoff


  • Focused primarily on handoff, less on design and prototyping features
  • May require adaptation for teams not used to separate handoff tools

Best for visual development

  • Free plan available
  • From $14/month (billed annually)

Webflow is a design and website-building tool that empowers users to create professional, responsive websites. It’s regarded as best for visual development due to its user-friendly interface that allows for designing with real-time visual feedback.

Why it's a good InVision alternative:

Webflow combines powerful design and development tools with a user-friendly interface, enabling seamless creation and collaboration on web projects. Its real-time collaboration features and robust integrations make it easy for teams to work together efficiently, while its extensive customization options provide flexibility for diverse project needs.

Standout features & integrations:

Features include a visual drag-and-drop editor, responsive design capabilities, customizable templates, advanced interactions and animations, CMS functionality, built-in SEO tools, e-commerce support, hosting services, real-time collaboration, code export options, form and database management, automatic backups and version control, and extensive design flexibility with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript customization.

Integrations include Google Analytics, Lottie, Zapier, Mailchimp, Shopify, Memberstack, Jetboost, Airtable, HubSpot, and Typeform.

Pros and cons


  • Responsive design features for optimal viewing on various devices
  • Extensive CMS capabilities for content management
  • Intuitive visual editor for designing websites


  • Limited built-in features for complex website functionalities, potentially requiring custom code
  • May have a steep learning curve for beginners

Other InVision Alternatives

Below is a list of additional InVision alternatives that I shortlisted. While they didn’t make the top 10, they’re still valuable and worth further research.

If you still haven't found what you're looking for here, check out these other related tools that we've tested and evaluated:

InVision Alternatives Selection Criteria

When selecting alternatives to InVision, it's important to evaluate both the functionality and the ability to meet specific use cases that are most important for this type of software. Based on my personal trials and research, here's how I broke down the criteria when evaluating these tools:

Core Functionality - 25% of total weighting score

  • Creating and sharing interactive prototypes to simulate the user experience
  • Facilitating real-time collaboration and feedback collection from stakeholders
  • Maintaining version control to track changes and iterate designs efficiently
  • Enabling user testing to validate prototypes with real users
  • Streamlining the handoff from design to development with detailed specifications and assets

Additional Standout Features - 25% of total weighting score

  • Advanced animation tools and custom interaction capabilities to create highly dynamic prototypes
  • Support for conditional logic and variables to simulate complex user behaviors and data-driven interactions 
  • Capability to integrate with a wide range of external systems and tools beyond typical design platforms 
  • Features that support the creation and maintenance of design systems to ensure consistency across large projects 
  • Tools that offer unique testing and validation features, like eye-tracking and heatmap analytics, for deeper user behavior insights 

Usability - 10% of total weighting score

  • A clean, intuitive interface that balances depth of functionality with ease of use, making it accessible for both novice and experienced designers
  • Drag-and-drop functionality coupled with the ability to perform more complex tasks without extensive workarounds
  • Customizability of the workspace and toolbars to adapt to various user preferences and workflows
  • Responsive design capabilities that allow prototypes to be easily viewed and tested on multiple device types and screen sizes

Onboarding - 10% of total weighting score

  • Availability of comprehensive documentation and user guides that help new users understand how to use the platform effectively
  • Interactive product tours and onboarding checklists that guide users through the tool’s main features and workflows
  • Access to a library of templates and design assets that help users start prototyping immediately
  • Support for onboarding webinars, workshops, and one-on-one training sessions to ensure users can quickly leverage the tool’s full capabilities

Customer Support - 10% of total weighting score

  • Availability of live chat, email, and phone support with responsive and knowledgeable service teams
  • Community forums and user groups that provide peer-to-peer assistance and advice
  • Regular updates and clear communication about new features, bug fixes, and service changes
  • Comprehensive FAQ and troubleshooting guides that help users resolve common issues quickly

Value For Money - 10% of total weighting score

  • Transparent pricing models that provide good value based on the features and capabilities offered
  • Availability of a free trial or a freemium model that allows users to test the tool before committing
  • Flexible pricing plans that cater to different team sizes and usage needs, including discounts for annual commitments
  • Evidence that users get significant efficiency and productivity gains from the tool compared to the cost

Customer Reviews - 10% of total weighting score

  • Consistency of positive feedback regarding usability, features, and customer support
  • Reports of how the tool has improved design and prototyping processes for various teams
  • Feedback on any recurring issues or bugs and how the company responds to customer concerns
  • User testimonials that highlight real-world use cases and the impact of the tool on project outcomes

By applying these criteria, I ensure that each selected InVision alternative not only meets basic functional needs but also supports broader team and project goals effectively.

Key Features to Look for in InVision Alternatives

Here are some key features of InVision that your alternative software should be able to replicate or improve upon in order to be a good fit:

  • Hotspots: With hotspots, designers can add clickable areas to static designs, making it easier to visualize user flows and interactions.
  • Interactions: This feature allows designers to define various user interactions within prototypes, such as clicks, swipes, and hover effects, which helps in creating a more realistic and engaging user experience.
  • Transitions: This ensures that the prototype feels fluid and helps in understanding how users will navigate through the application.
  • Overlays: This feature enhances the depth and interactivity of prototypes by allowing designers to display additional information without changing the main screen.
  • Feedback Collection: Collecting comments directly within prototypes allows designers to gather feedback from team members in a centralized location. Overall, this streamlines the design iteration process and ensures that all feedback is easily accessible.
  • Inspect: This feature ensures that the development team has all the necessary information to implement the design accurately.
  • Multiple Device Support: Building prototypes that work seamlessly across various devices, including desktops, tablets, and smartphones, ensures that the design is responsive and provides a consistent user experience on all platforms.
  • Real-time Collaboration: This feature improves efficiency and ensures that all team members are aligned throughout the design process.
  • Sketch Integration: With the right tool, designers can easily import their Sketch files into the prototyping tool, saving time and maintaining consistency in design elements.
  • Interactive Prototyping: This capability allows for the creation of dynamic and engaging prototypes that closely mimic the final product.

What’s Next?

Subscribe to the DPM newsletter to get regular updates when we publish fresh how-to guides and articles on digital project management topics.

Hermann Fink
By Hermann Fink

Hermann Fink is a technology enthusiast and the co-founder of Rünna Advertising, a multinational digital agency that has been active for over a decade and served clients like Ford, AstraZeneca, Disney, and Didi. In addition to being a business owner, Hermann gathered corporate experience in project management during his time at Hewlett Packard in the mid-2010s.