Actionstep Review: Pros, Cons, Core Features and Pricing Details
Actionstep is a project management software for lawyers that centralizes workflows, documents, billing, and case management in one cloud-based platform. If you’re tired of clunky systems and patchwork solutions, Actionstep aims to help your team collaborate, track cases, and automate routine legal tasks with clarity and control.
In this review, I break down Actionstep’s features, use cases, advantages, drawbacks, and pricing, so you can decide if this project management tool actually fits your practice—or if you should consider other options.
Actionstep Evaluation Summary
- Pricing upon request
- Free demo available
Why You Can Trust Us
We’ve been testing and reviewing project management software since 2012. As project managers ourselves, we know how critical and difficult it is to make the right decision when selecting software.
We invest in deep research to help our audience make better software purchasing decisions. We’ve tested more than 2,000 tools for different project management use cases and written over 1,000 comprehensive software reviews. Learn how we stay transparent & our software review methodology.
Actionstep Overview
When judging Actionstep against other legal project management tools, I find its workflow automation, custom matter types, and built-in billing functionality put it ahead for mid-sized firms needing flexibility. The interface can feel dense, and onboarding takes effort, but the deep integrations and responsive support make selection worthwhile for teams ready to commit. If you’re comparing options for a practice managing high case volumes or complex, repeatable processes, Actionstep stands out—especially if you want most daily tools in one place.
pros
-
Workflow automation helps streamline repeatable legal processes
-
Matter management supports complex, multi-step legal cases
-
Built-in billing and trust accounting keeps finances organized
cons
-
User interface feels dated compared to newer, user-friendly platforms
-
Feature depth can overwhelm solo and small practices
-
Reporting customization is limited without advanced setup
-
Accelo
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.4 -
Wrike
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.2 -
Forecast
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.6
Our Review Methodology
How We Test & Score Tools
We’ve spent years building, refining, and improving our software testing and scoring system. The rubric is designed to capture the nuances of software selection and what makes a tool effective, focusing on critical aspects of the decision-making process.
Below, you can see exactly how our testing and scoring works across seven criteria. It allows us to provide an unbiased evaluation of the software based on core functionality, standout features, ease of use, onboarding, customer support, integrations, customer reviews, and value for money.
Core Functionality (25% of final scoring)
The starting point of our evaluation is always the core functionality of the tool. Does it have the basic features and functions that a user would expect to see? Are any of those core features locked to higher-tiered pricing plans? At its core, we expect a tool to stand up against the baseline capabilities of its competitors.
Standout Features (25% of final scoring)
Next, we evaluate uncommon standout features that go above and beyond the core functionality typically found in tools of its kind. A high score reflects specialized or unique features that make the product faster, more efficient, or offer additional value to the user.
We also evaluate how easy it is to integrate with other tools typically found in the tech stack to expand the functionality and utility of the software. Tools offering plentiful native integrations, 3rd party connections, and API access to build custom integrations score best.
Ease of Use (10% of final scoring)
We consider how quick and easy it is to execute the tasks defined in the core functionality using the tool. High scoring software is well designed, intuitive to use, offers mobile apps, provides templates, and makes relatively complex tasks seem simple.
Onboarding (10% of final scoring)
We know how important rapid team adoption is for a new platform, so we evaluate how easy it is to learn and use a tool with minimal training. We evaluate how quickly a team member can get set up and start using the tool with no experience. High scoring solutions indicate little or no support is required.
Customer Support (10% of final scoring)
We review how quick and easy it is to get unstuck and find help by phone, live chat, or knowledge base. Tools and companies that provide real-time support score best, while chatbots score worst.
Customer Reviews (10% of final scoring)
Beyond our own testing and evaluation, we consider the net promoter score from current and past customers. We review their likelihood, given the option, to choose the tool again for the core functionality. A high scoring software reflects a high net promoter score from current or past customers.
Value for Money (10% of final scoring)
Lastly, in consideration of all the other criteria, we review the average price of entry level plans against the core features and consider the value of the other evaluation criteria. Software that delivers more, for less, will score higher.
Core Features
Workflow Automation
Automate document generation, client intake, and reminders for any legal process. This allows firms to reduce manual work and ensures nothing falls through the cracks.
Matter Management
Track legal cases from intake to completion with custom matter types. You can organize documents, timelines, and communications in one centralized place.
Built-in Time Tracking
Capture billable hours as you work with one-click timers or manual entries. This helps your team ensure no billable work is missed and all time is easily itemized.
Document Management
Create, store, and retrieve documents directly within each matter. Use version control and client sharing to keep your files secure and accessible.
Billing and Trust Accounting
Generate invoices, manage payments, and handle trust accounting with compliance built in. This feature ties financials directly to matters, reducing reconciliation headaches.
Task and Calendar Management
Assign tasks, schedule deadlines, and view matter-specific calendars. This makes it easy for everyone to stay on top of action items and key dates.
Ease of Use
Actionstep doesn’t hide its complexity—some users call its interface dated and navigation busy—but it rewards legal teams willing to learn. Many appreciate customizable dashboards, deeply linked matters, and integrated billing, even if setup takes effort. I think once workflows are set up, lawyers find daily use surprisingly efficient given its breadth.
Integrations
Actionstep integrates with Microsoft 365, Xero, InfoTrack, HubSpot, DocuSign, and Adobe Sign, among others.
It also offers an open API and connects with some third-party integration platforms.
Actionstep Specs
- 2-Factor Authentication
- API
- Appointment Scheduling
- Batch Permissions & Access
- Billing/Invoicing
- Budgeting
- Customer Management
- Data Export
- Data Import
- Data Visualization
- Electronic Prescribing
- Expense Tracking
- External Integrations
- File Transfer
- HIPAA Compliance
- Multi-User
- Notifications
- Patient Management
- Report & Compliance
- Self-service Portal
- Task Scheduling/Tracking
