Calm Leadership: A leader’s composed reaction to bad news sets the tone for team honesty and communication.
Diagnostic Approach: Understanding the full scope of an issue requires gathering diverse perspectives before taking action.
Clear Recovery Path: Successful recovery plans are tangible and address both immediate issues and future risks.
Termination Courage: Recognizing when to terminate a project is a strategic decision that requires professional courage.
Intentional First Move: Deliberate initial responses, rather than impulsive reactions, distinguish effective project managers from heroes.
Every project manager will eventually face this moment: the status report turns red, a key milestone gets missed, or someone walks into your office with news you were hoping not to hear. What happens in the minutes, hours, and days that follow often determines whether the project recovers or continues to unravel.
The instinct in those moments is to act fast. To escalate, to fix, to be seen doing something. But the most experienced practitioners tend to resist that instinct. Across conversations with project management coaches and practitioners, a clear pattern emerged: the first intervention is rarely the most obvious one. It's more deliberate, more human, and more diagnostic than most PMs expect.
Here’s what our experts say they would do when a project is off track.
Get Calm Before You Get Busy: The Leadership Reaction That Sets the Tone
Before any tactical intervention happens, something more fundamental has to occur. The way a leader receives bad news determines whether the team will keep bringing it.
Johanna Rothman, Owner of Rothman Consulting Group, coaches leaders to be precise about this: "If you get bad news, make sure you do not frown, put your head in your hands, or anything like that. And if you do, say, I'm not upset with you, bearer of bad news, I'm so glad you told me... I am upset at the bad news." It sounds simple, but the distinction is everything. A leader who conflates the message with the messenger — even through a grimace or a sigh — teaches their team that honesty is punished. And a team that stops surfacing problems and is unable to have hard conversations early is a team that guarantees those problems will become crises.
If you get bad news, make sure you don’t frown, put your head in your hand, or anything like that. And if you do, say, ‘I’m not upset with you, bearer of bad news, I’m so glad you told me.'
The composure required in that moment extends beyond just receiving news. Dr. Mike Clayton, CEO and Founder, OnlinePMCourses.com, is direct about what it means to lead through a project in trouble: "Projects don't need heroes. They need professionals who will calmly address the situation... [to] sit them down quietly, allocate roles, and work through the problem." The urge to swoop in, take over, and personally save the day is a trap. A calm, structured, professional who doesn’t fear allocation in the midst of chaos is what the moment actually calls for.
Find the Truth: Diagnose Before You Prescribe
Once composure is established, the next temptation is to start fixing. Resist it. You cannot fix what you don't accurately understand, and the official status of a troubled project is rarely the whole picture.
SVP of Horizontal Digital, Pam Butkowski's first move is to go wide before going deep. "Talk to everyone! I don't just take my PM's word for it. I don't just take the client's word for it. I talk to everyone. Get everyone's perspective and then figure out where the truth is between all of the different stories," she explains. When a project is suffering, emotions run high and perspectives diverge. Her method cuts through that: "The first thing I do is figure out where we're actually at. And then I use the data. But I start with people."
Talk to everyone! I don’t just take my PM’s word for it. I don’t just take the client’s word for it. I talk to everyone. Get everyone’s perspective and then figure out where the truth is between all of the different stories.
For Bill Dow, the diagnostic has a specific starting point. "When a project's in trouble, the first place I'm gonna go to is the schedule," he says. "Who's working on what, where are you, how far behind are you, what does this look like, how do we turn a project around by the schedule?" The schedule, in his view, is the root document. It tells the clearest story about where things broke down and what recovery will actually require.
Suzanne Peck, Sr. Business Partner, PMO at Grampians Health, takes a collaborative approach to the same diagnostic challenge. Rather than diagnosing from the top down, her first move is to get all the players into a room: "Getting them to work through what are the blockers, the causes, the contributing factors." She acknowledges that these sessions don't always start cleanly — "there's normally a lot of whinging at the start and a lot of finger-pointing" — but that's exactly the point.
Once people are in the room together, the real picture starts to emerge. Her method is simple: use Post-it notes, having team members write down issues and blockers before putting them up on the wall for the group to see collectively. From there, the focus shifts to brainstorming solutions and creative collaboration.
Define the Path Forward: From Red to Green
With an honest picture of where things stand, the work of recovery can begin. And the most effective recovery plans share a common quality — they are concrete, not aspirational.
Nalini Vadivelan uses a framework she calls the Path to Green, or PTG. At the first glimpse of going off track, she says, "the first intervention would be to look at it and ask, what does the path back to green look like?" But she doesn't stop at fixing the current problem. She also advises teams to "explore things that could go wrong again" — building the recovery plan and the risk mitigation plan simultaneously.
The first intervention would be to look at it and ask, what does the path back to green look like?
Derek Fredrickson, Founder & CEO, The COO Solution, focuses on what reaching a true red state should trigger at the leadership level. "Red is off track. We are not confident. We are off track and we don't know how to get it back on track," he explains. In that state, he argues, senior leaders can no longer stay at arm's length: "That is especially powerful for the CEO, because that's typically where they do need to step back in. Maybe they need to clarify what the real objective is, or they need to clarify what people's roles are, or maybe it's a question of allocation of resources." Recovery isn't always a PM-level problem to solve alone — sometimes it requires the people with the authority to reset direction to actually use that authority.
Know When to Pull the Plug: The Courage to Recommend Termination
Not every off-track project should be saved. This is perhaps the hardest truth in project recovery and the one most PMs are least prepared to act on.
Kiron Bondale, Mentor at Aksys Consulting Inc., frames it as a matter of professional courage: "If you can tell that the project is no longer going to deliver the benefits that it was expected to, then you should be the one that is raising the flag to say, our benefits have eroded, there's significant opportunity costs we're going to incur by continuing to invest in this project," he says. The enemy in these situations is the pull of momentum — the sense that because so much has already been spent, stopping now would mean it was all for nothing. His response to that thinking is unambiguous: "Let's not get caught up in the sunk cost fallacy here. Let's go ahead and terminate this project."
If you can tell that the project is no longer going to deliver the benefits that it was expected to, then you should be the one that is raising that flag.
Recommending termination is not failure. It is one of the most strategically sound moves a project manager can make — and one that requires more courage than any recovery plan.
Your First Move Matters Most
The throughline across every approach described here is intentionality. Whether the first step is regulating your own reaction, having honest conversations with every stakeholder, pulling up the schedule, running a workshop, mapping a path to green, or recommending that the project be shut down — the best project managers resist the urge to react and instead make a deliberate, considered first move.
What that first move looks like will depend on the project, the team, and the nature of the problem. But the instinct to choose it thoughtfully — rather than default to panic or false urgency — is what separates professionals from heroes.
And as Dr. Mike Clayton put it, projects don't need heroes. They need professionals who will calmly address the situation.
So the next time a project goes sideways, before you do anything else: pause. Then choose your first move wisely.
Want more insights from experts like those featured in today's article? Sign up for a free DPM membership.
