PM Experts: The Skill Gap I See Most Often When Coaching or Mentoring PMs
Checkbox PM Problem: Many project managers confuse project completion with delivering true business value, which limits strategic impact.
Business Acumen Gap: PMs often struggle to connect day-to-day tasks with broader organizational goals, hindering business alignment.
Human Skills Gap: Emotional intelligence is crucial for project managers but often overlooked in training and development.
Mindset Gap: Rigid thinking among PMs prevents adaptive problem-solving and flexibility in project management methodologies.
AI and Upskilling Gap: Resistance to AI adoption threatens project managers' careers, highlighting the need for continuous learning.
The project management profession is evolving faster than most project managers can keep up with. Certifications are being earned, methodologies are being mastered, and new PM tools are being adopted — yet something is still missing. After speaking with some of the most experienced voices in the field, a clear picture has emerged: the gaps holding PMs back today aren't primarily technical. They are strategic, human, and deeply rooted in mindset.
Here is what the experts are seeing on the ground.
The "Checkbox PM" Problem: Confusing Delivery with Value
The most frequently cited gap across our conversations was what Bill Dow, Director of Enterprise PMO at UW Medicine, bluntly calls the "checkbox PM" mentality. As he puts it, "we have a lot of checkbox PMs. That's a thing out there. I just want to do my risk, my issues, my actions, but that's not where the value is. The value is in the strategy. Do you actually know the project you're running? Not just what are the risks and the schedule of the project — do you know the business outcome, the ROI?"
Unlock for Free
Create a free account to finish this piece and join a community of forward-thinking leaders unlocking tools, playbooks, and insights for thriving in the age of AI.
Have an account? Log In
Do you actually know the project you’re running? Not just what are the risks and the schedule of the project — do you know the business outcome, the ROI?
What makes this gap particularly stubborn is that it doesn't disappear with experience. Bruno Morgante, founder of the consulting service Mantegora, notes that this is "especially common for more experienced PMs — people that are already 20 years in the job and they still believe that project management is about delivering your thing, your project on target, on time and on cost...they don't look at the fact that actually every project should deliver something meaningful for the organization." Seniority, it turns out, is no guarantee of strategic thinking.
Every project should deliver something meaningful for the organization.
The Business Acumen Gap: Thinking Beyond the Project Plan
Closely related to the checkbox problem is a broader gap in business acumen — the inability to connect day-to-day project work to the organization's larger commercial goals. Emmanuels Magaya frames it directly: "ultimately, you're helping the business make money. So you need to think beyond a project plan, beyond chasing stakeholders, and think in the point of how does my work actually help the business get more clients... project professionals can also shift their thinking to say, I need to become more business-minded. I need to become more business aligned."
Ultimately, you’re helping the business make money. So you need to think beyond a project plan, beyond a project plan, beyond chasing stakeholders, and think, ‘how does my work actually help the business get more clients?'
This gap is especially pronounced among PMs who have risen from technical roles. Marcus Glowasz observes that technical PMs "come usually from a technical background and then evolved to some project management role, but then they're often lacking the business focus skills. You have to get out of your whole technical area, a little bit, filter a lot of your technical information, and translate it into business language." The ability to speak to executives in terms of risk, revenue, and outcomes — rather than systems and specifications — is a skill many technically strong PMs simply haven't developed.
[Technical PMs] come usually from a technical background and then evolve to some project management role, but then they’re often lacking the business focus skills.
The Human Skills Gap: Emotional Intelligence
Ask any experienced PM coach what they wish were taught more in PM training programs, and the answer is almost always the same: the human stuff. PM consultant Sabrina Di Paolo identifies an "important piece that gets missed in traditional project management training and education... there's a lot of emotional intelligence that needs to come with project management. And sometimes we don't focus on that a lot. The empathy, the having integrity, it's very, very important."
An important piece that gets missed in traditional project management training and education… there’s a lot of emotional intelligence that needs to come with project management.
The Relationship & Influence Gap: PMs Need to Sell, Not Just Manage
Process competence used to be enough to set a PM apart. It no longer is. Michael Gold argues that "saying you're process orientated as a project manager is meaningless because who isn't process oriented with AI. So it becomes even more a focus on the human side of things, the relationship management, stakeholder management, persuasiveness, communication skills. AI can't replace that one to one human interaction. What things were stereotypically laden that salespeople negatively, I think, are slowly becoming more important from a project management kind of view."
AI can’t replace that one to one human interaction. What things were stereotypically laden that salespeople negatively, I think, are slowly becoming more important from a project management kind of view.
In other words, the skills we used to associate with salespeople — confidence, persuasiveness, reading a room — are rapidly becoming core PM competencies. Pam Butkowski is already building this into her team's development plan. "We're going to be focused this year on some of the things that frankly AI can never do that our team excels at. So we're going to be focused on conflict resolution tactics, on negotiation training, on triaging projects, not just from a data standpoint, but, 'how do I use my spidey senses to figure out what's going on here?'" The instinct, intuition, and interpersonal agility that comes from years of working with people — that's what no machine can replicate.
We’re going to be focused this year on some of the things that AI can never do that our team excels at – conflict resolution tactics, negotiation training, triaging projects, etc.
The Mindset Gap: Rigid Thinking in a Gray World
Several experts pointed to something deeper than a skills gap — a gap in how PMs think. Oliver F. Lehmann calls it plainly a "mindset gap," describing how "we allowed some people to force us into this black and white thinking, where I think we have a lot of gray shades. It's just not a skill gap. It's a big hole... it's a mindset gap."
This black and white rigidity often shows up in methodology wars — PMs who are dogmatically Agile or strictly Waterfall, unable to adapt their approach to what a project actually demands. He elaborates: "The [right] mindset would be the situational mindset. The understanding that the same practice, the same method that can be helpful in one moment can be very damaging in another one. That we have to adjust this to the needs of the moment"
We allowed some people to force us into this black and white thinking, where I think we have a lot of gray shades. It’s just not a skill gap. It’s a big hole…it’s a mindset gap.
The most effective PMs aren't ideologues. They read the situation and respond accordingly. The ability to sit comfortably in the gray, to hold competing frameworks without picking a side, is a form of professional maturity that many PMs — experienced ones included — haven't reached.
The AI & Upskilling Gap: Resistance to Change and Loss of Domain Expertise
No conversation about PM skill gaps would be complete without addressing AI. The challenge here runs in two directions at once.
The first is simple resistance. Varun Anand describes the frustration of watching PMs refuse to engage: "I have been shouting on top of my voice, 'learn AI, learn AI..have you upskilled yourself? Have you learned?' Some people are okay, some people are not okay. Because they think, 'I don't want to change.'" Rigidity in the face of a technology that is reshaping the profession isn't just a missed opportunity — it's a career risk.
I have been shouting on top of my voice, ‘learn AI, learn AI…have you upskilled yourself? Have you learned?’ Some people are okay, some people are not okay.
But the second direction is subtler and, arguably, more concerning in the long run. Markus Kopko warns that "what most people have not realized yet is that you need to be an expert in your domain to get good results out of AI... the problem we are going to face in the not so far future, I would assume, is that if younger people are no longer getting that knowledge and becoming experts over time, how should they, in the future, be able to assess and review the results of the AI outputs?" A PM who leans on AI without building foundational expertise first may produce faster work — but not necessarily better work. And they may never know the difference.
What most people have not realized yet is that you need to be an expert in your domain to get good results out of AI.
Conclusion: The Gaps Are Human, Not Technical
The through line across all of these conversations is hard to miss. The gaps that matter most — the ones that separate good PMs from truly valuable ones — are not about tools, templates, or certifications. They are about strategic thinking, emotional intelligence, business fluency, adaptability, and the willingness to keep growing.
The PMs who will thrive in the years ahead are the ones who understand that their job is not to complete projects. It is to deliver outcomes, build trust, influence decisions, and help their organizations win. That requires a fundamentally different orientation than checking boxes — and it starts with being honest about where the gaps are.