Seavus Project Viewer Review 2026: Pros, Cons, Features, Cost
Seavus Project Viewer is a Microsoft project viewer that opens and displays Microsoft Project plans in .mpp format. It’s for stakeholders who need to review schedules and tasks or report progress without editing the project plan. Compared with Microsoft Project, Seavus is a more focused choice when your team needs read-only access without a full project-editing license.
Seavus Project Viewer Evaluation Summary
- From $114/user/year (billed annually)
- 15-day free trial
Why Trust Our Software Recommendations
Our team has been testing and reviewing software since 2012. As project managers ourselves, we know how difficult—and important—it is to choose the right software.
For this guide, we evaluated tools using hands-on testing and independent research, scoring tools using our selection criteria. We also draw on insights from industry thought leaders and practicing project management experts.
Our reviews reflect our human editorial judgment, not a sales pitch.
Expert reviewers:
Seavus Project Viewer Overview
I’d choose Seavus Project Viewer when stakeholders need read-only access to Microsoft Project plans without full editing licenses. Its Windows and Mac apps open .mpp files from Project 2007–2024 and display 27-plus views, including reports on late tasks and costs. The familiar, Microsoft Project-like interface, 15-day trial, and perpetual license options make evaluation straightforward and cost-conscious for reviewer groups. Compared with full project suites, it trades editing depth for lower license costs. Task Update, SharePoint, and OneDrive suit Microsoft-based environments, but integrations are limited and reviewers can’t edit plans. Email, phone, and remote support are available.
pros
-
Matches Microsoft Project views across more than 27 layouts.
-
Reviewers praise stable viewing of large project files.
-
Reports surface overdue tasks, costs, and resource data.
cons
-
Reviewers can’t edit project schedules in the viewer.
-
Limited integrations and no documented API constrain connected workflows.
-
Paid licenses cost more than free viewer alternatives.
-
Smartsheet
Visit WebsiteThis rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.4.4 -
Celoxis
Visit WebsiteThis rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.4.5 -
Accelo
Visit WebsiteThis rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.4.4
Our Review Methodology
How We Test & Score Tools
We’ve spent years building, refining, and improving our software testing and scoring system. The rubric is designed to capture the nuances of software selection and what makes a tool effective, focusing on critical aspects of the decision-making process.
Below, you can see exactly how our testing and scoring works across seven criteria. It allows us to provide an unbiased evaluation of the software based on core functionality, standout features, ease of use, onboarding, customer support, integrations, customer reviews, and value for money.
Core Functionality (25% of final scoring)
The starting point of our evaluation is always the core functionality of the tool. Does it have the basic features and functions that a user would expect to see? Are any of those core features locked to higher-tiered pricing plans? At its core, we expect a tool to stand up against the baseline capabilities of its competitors.
Standout Features (25% of final scoring)
Next, we evaluate uncommon standout features that go above and beyond the core functionality typically found in tools of its kind. A high score reflects specialized or unique features that make the product faster, more efficient, or offer additional value to the user.
We also evaluate how easy it is to integrate with other tools typically found in the tech stack to expand the functionality and utility of the software. Tools offering plentiful native integrations, 3rd party connections, and API access to build custom integrations score best.
Ease of Use (10% of final scoring)
We consider how quick and easy it is to execute the tasks defined in the core functionality using the tool. High scoring software is well designed, intuitive to use, offers mobile apps, provides templates, and makes relatively complex tasks seem simple.
Onboarding (10% of final scoring)
We know how important rapid team adoption is for a new platform, so we evaluate how easy it is to learn and use a tool with minimal training. We evaluate how quickly a team member can get set up and start using the tool with no experience. High scoring solutions indicate little or no support is required.
Customer Support (10% of final scoring)
We review how quick and easy it is to get unstuck and find help by phone, live chat, or knowledge base. Tools and companies that provide real-time support score best, while chatbots score worst.
Customer Reviews (10% of final scoring)
Beyond our own testing and evaluation, we consider the net promoter score from current and past customers. We review their likelihood, given the option, to choose the tool again for the core functionality. A high scoring software reflects a high net promoter score from current or past customers.
Value for Money (10% of final scoring)
Lastly, in consideration of all the other criteria, we review the average price of entry level plans against the core features and consider the value of the other evaluation criteria. Software that delivers more, for less, will score higher.
Core Features
Microsoft Project File Viewing
Open Microsoft Project .mpp plans in a read-only viewer without giving every stakeholder an editing license. This lets reviewers check the shared schedule while keeping the source plan unchanged.
Gantt Chart Views
Gantt charts display tasks alongside their dates, durations, dependencies, and milestones on a timeline. Use the view to see how a milestone’s timing relates to the work scheduled before it.
Tracking Gantt
Tracking Gantt overlays baseline information with current progress so reviewers can compare the plan with actual results. For example, you can spot a task that’s finishing later than its baseline schedule.
Task And Resource Usage Views
Task Usage shows assigned resources alongside tasks, while Resource Usage shows each resource’s assigned work. These views help you check who’s working on a task and review allocations for potential workload conflicts.
Project Reports
Predefined and graphical reports summarize information such as overdue tasks, costs, resource costs, and project health. A reviewer can use an overdue-task report to focus a status review on work that needs attention.
Filtering, Sorting, And Grouping
Apply filters, sort records, and group project information in supported views. For example, filter a task view to focus a review on overdue work instead of scanning the full schedule.
Ease of Use
Seavus Project Viewer is easy to pick up if you already know Microsoft Project: its familiar interface and 27-plus views make schedules, resource allocations, and reports straightforward to review. Reviewers also praise its stable handling of large files, which matters when stakeholders need to inspect complex plans. I’d recommend it for read-only reviews, but its usability has a clear limit: you can send task updates, yet you can’t edit the schedule itself.
Integrations
Seavus Project Viewer integrates with Microsoft SharePoint, OneDrive, Google Drive, and Microsoft Project Server for accessing and sharing project files. Its published documentation does not list a public API or integrations with third-party automation platforms.
Seavus Project Viewer Specs
- A/B Testing
- API
- Automated Testing
- Browser Compatibility Testing
- Bug Tracking
- Calendar Management
- CI/CD Integration
- Dashboard
- Data Export
- Data Import
- Data Visualization
- Developer Tools
- External Integrations
- History/Version Control
- Manual Testing
- Multi-User
- Notifications
- Performance Testing
- Regression Testing
- Scheduling
- Status Notifications
- Third-Party Plugins/Add-Ons
