

Wrike vs. Jira: Comparison & Expert Reviews For 2025
Wrike provides a flexible platform for managing projects across different teams and industries. Jira, by contrast, is built specifically for software teams to track and manage development workflows. While both tools support collaboration, Wrike offers broader use cases, while Jira focuses on the needs of tech teams.
In this article, we'll compare the tools, their features, pros and cons, and pricing to help you decide which project management software aligns best with your needs.
Wrike vs. Jira: An Overview
Why You Can Trust Us
Wrike vs. Jira Pricing Comparison
Wrike | Jira | |
---|---|---|
Free Trial | Freemium version available | 7-day free trial + free plan available |
Pricing | From $10/user/month (min of 2 seats) | From $7.16/user/month (billed annually, min 5 seats) |
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Get Expert AdviceOpens new windowWrike pricing is tiered, offering various plans based on team size and needs, with potential extra costs for add-ons like custom integrations or advanced analytics.
Jira pricing also follows a tiered model, often requiring additional fees for premium features and third-party app integrations.
To select the tool with the right pricing, assess your team's specific requirements and projected growth. Consider the total cost of ownership, including any necessary add-ons, to ensure the chosen tool aligns with your team's long-term goals and budget.
Wrike vs. Jira Feature Comparison
Wrike’s customizable dashboards make it easy to track and manage multiple project timelines, which is especially useful for complex marketing campaigns.
Jira’s Kanban and Scrum boards are well-suited for agile development teams that need strong issue tracking and sprint planning. Each tool supports different project management styles, helping your team choose the right fit for its specific needs.
Wrike | Jira | |
---|---|---|
API | ||
Budgeting | ||
Calendar Management | ||
Contact Management | ||
Dashboards | ||
Dependency Tracking | ||
Document Sharing | ||
Expense Tracking | ||
External Integrations | ||
File Sharing | ||
Gantt Charts | ||
Kanban Boards | ||
Mobile App | ||
Project Management | ||
Resource Management | ||
Status Notifications | ||
Task Scheduling/Tracking | ||
Time Management | ||
Workflow Management |
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Get Expert AdviceOpens new windowWrike vs. Jira Integrations
Integration | Wrike | Jira |
Slack | ✅ | ✅ |
Microsoft Teams | ✅ | ✅ |
Google Workspace | ✅ | ✅ |
Salesforce | ✅ | ✅ |
Zendesk | ✅ | ✅ |
Adobe Creative Cloud | ✅ | ❌ |
HubSpot | ✅ | ❌ |
Figma | ❌ | ✅ |
Github | ❌ | ✅ |
Miro | ❌ | ✅ |
API | ✅ | ✅ |
Zapier | ✅ | ✅ |
Wrike integrates with Adobe Creative Cloud to simplify creative workflows, making it ideal for marketing teams managing multiple design projects.
Jira connects with GitHub to support development teams with efficient code management and issue tracking. Both tools offer integrations that boost collaboration and align with the software your team already uses.
Wrike vs. Jira Security, Compliance & Reliability
Factor | Wrike | Jira |
Data Privacy | Wrike complies with GDPR and offers data residency options for user data. | Jira adheres to GDPR standards and provides data encryption at rest and in transit. |
Regulatory Compliance | Wrike is SOC 2 certified, ensuring robust security controls and processes. | Jira meets SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 27001 standards for managing information security. |
Encryotion | Wrike uses AES-256 encryption for data at rest. | Jira employs AES-256 encryption for both data at rest and in transit. |
Uptime Reliability | Wrike guarantees a 99.9% uptime SLA, ensuring reliable access. | Wrike guarantees a 99.9% uptime Service Level Agreement (SLA), ensuring reliable access. |
Wrike and Jira both offer strong security and compliance features, but Jira’s broader range of certifications may provide added confidence for tech-focused teams. To choose the right tool, consider your industry’s regulatory requirements, review each platform’s certifications, and assess their data protection measures.
Wrike vs. Jira Ease of Use
Factor | Wrike | Jira |
User Interface | Wrike offers an intuitive interface with drag-and-drop functionality for tasks. | Jira has a more complex interface tailored for technical users and agile methodologies. |
Onboarding Experience | Wrike provides guided tutorials and templates to ease the learning curve. | Jira’s onboarding can be challenging due to its extensive feature set and customization options. |
Setup | Wrike allows quick setup with pre-built project templates. | Jira’s setup requires more time due to its detailed configuration options. |
Support | Wrike provides 24/7 support, along with a comprehensive knowledge base. | Jira provides extensive documentation and community support, but live support is limited. |
Wrike is easier for newcomers with its user-friendly interface and quick setup, but can be limiting for those needing deep customization. Jira, while complex, excels in flexibility and is better suited for tech teams familiar with agile practices.
Wrike vs Jira: Pros & Cons
Wrike
- Wrike's AI features are available in all plans at no extra cost.
- The user-friendly interface ensures easy navigation for your team.
- Wrike's proofing feature allows you to compare file versions dynamically.
- Two-factor authentication is only available with the enterprise plan.
- Some integrations require an additional cost, regardless of the plan.
- It can be unclear where form responses are stored within the tool.
Jira
- Agile workflow management supports Scrum and Kanban and can improve your teams' productivity.
- Automation rules are easy to set up, which helps your team speed up their work.
- Custom filters can be created and accessed quickly, which improves your team's efficiency.
- The interface can be too crowded in Scrum projects, which can make it hard for your team to navigate.
- There's a lack of resource management capabilities, which could limit your team's planning.
- Field names can be confusing, which might slow down your team's workflow.
Best Use Cases for Wrike and Jira
Wrike
- Marketing Teams Wrike’s proofing feature helps you streamline creative approval processes with ease.
- Creative Agencies Wrike’s dynamic file version comparison keeps your creative projects on track.
- IT Departments Wrike’s user-friendly interface simplifies complex project coordination for your team.
- Product Development Wrike’s AI features boost your team’s productivity without extra costs.
- Event Management Wrike’s task scheduling ensures your events are planned and executed flawlessly.
- Construction Projects Wrike’s robust project tracking keeps your construction timelines and budgets in check.
Jira
- Software development Jira’s agile tools like Scrum and Kanban boards make it perfect for managing software projects.
- IT departments Its issue tracking capabilities help your team efficiently handle technical support and bug fixes.
- Tech startups Jira offers customization capabilities that allow your team to scale and adapt as your projects grow.
- Agile teams Sprint planning and backlog management features keep your agile processes organized and effective.
- Large enterprises Jira’s automation rules can streamline your complex workflows and improve team productivity.
- Project managers Its reporting and analytics provide insights that help you make informed decisions quickly.
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Get Expert AdviceOpens new windowWho Should Use Wrike, and Who Should Use Jira?
In my opinion, Wrike is a strong choice for marketing teams, creative agencies, and organizations that need a user-friendly platform with quick onboarding and simple project management.
Jira is better suited for software development teams, tech companies, and agile environments that require advanced issue tracking and extensive customization. If your team values ease of use and speed, Wrike is a great fit; if you need flexibility and technical depth, Jira is a better option.
Differences Between Wrike and Jira
Wrike | Jira | |
---|---|---|
Automation | Wrike includes built-in automation for task management and reminders. | Jira offers advanced automation tools for issue tracking and sprint planning. |
Customization | Wrike provides basic customization with templates and dashboards. | Jira allows deep customization, catering to specific workflows and agile processes. |
Onboarding | Wrike has an easy onboarding with tutorials and pre-built templates. | Jira’s onboarding is more complex due to extensive features and setup options. |
Pricing | Wrike uses a tiered pricing model with additional costs for advanced features. | Jira also has a tiered model but often requires extra fees for premium features. |
User Interface | Wrike offers a clean, intuitive interface with drag-and-drop features. | Jira’s interface is more complex, designed for technical users and agile teams. |
Visit WrikeOpens new window | Visit JiraOpens new window |
Similarities Between Wrike and Jira
Collaboration | Both Wrike and Jira offer collaboration features, such as task comments and file sharing, which enable team communication within projects. |
---|---|
Integrations | Wrike and Jira integrate with popular tools like Slack and Google Workspace, ensuring seamless workflow connectivity. |
Pricing | Wrike and Jira use tiered pricing models that allow teams to scale their usage and access advanced features as needed. |
Reporting | Both tools offer robust reporting capabilities, with Wrike providing customizable dashboards and Jira offering detailed progress tracking. |
Security | Both platforms provide strong security features like data encryption and compliance with GDPR to protect your team’s information. |
Visit WrikeOpens new window Visit JiraOpens new window |