Float vs. Runn: Comparison & Expert Reviews For 2026
Float delivers people-first resource management that ties planning to profit so you can staff fast and protect margins. Runn brings strategic clarity with live capacity forecasts and scenario planning so you can align work to the roadmap. Compared to each other, Float leans into utilization and financials inside scheduling, while Runn focuses on forward-looking forecasts and portfolio visibility.
Read my detailed comparison of each resource management tool’s features, pros and cons, and pricing options so you can find the right fit to better manage your projects and resources.
Float.com vs. Runn: An Overview
Float.com
Runn
Why You Can Trust Us
Float.com vs. Runn Pricing Comparison
| Float.com | Runn | |
|---|---|---|
| Free Trial | 30-day free trial available | 14-day free trial + free plan available |
| Pricing | From $7/scheduled user/month | From $10/user/month (billed annually) |
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Get Expert AdviceOpens new windowFloat vs. Runn Pricing & Hidden Costs
Float’s pricing model is based on the number of scheduled people, not total users — you only pay for team members actively added to the Schedule for resourcing. This flexible approach ensures that teams aren’t charged for inactive or non-scheduled users, keeping costs aligned with actual usage. Runn’s model also charges per active person. Its pricing tiers expand with access to advanced features like detailed forecasting, reporting, and API integrations, allowing teams to choose the level of functionality that best fits their needs.
To choose the right project and resource management tool for your needs, evaluate your team's size and functionality requirements, and consider trial periods or demos to see how each tool fits your workflow and budget.
Float.com vs. Runn Feature Comparison
Float’s live utilization and profit-aware scheduling lets you drag-drop allocations, then spot overcapacity and margin risks on an agency retainer week. Runn’s scenario planning and tentative projects are great for mapping pipeline shifts across quarters when you’re balancing hiring with delivery. Compared to Runn, Float feels better when you need tight actuals vs. planned visibility inside the schedule, while Runn shines for multi-month forecasting across teams.
| Float.com | Runn | |
|---|---|---|
| API | ||
| Approval Workflows | ||
| Audit Trail | ||
| Budgeting | ||
| Calendar Management | ||
| Compliance Tracking | ||
| Custom Reports | ||
| Customer Management | ||
| Dashboard | ||
| Data Export | ||
| Data Import | ||
| Data Visualization | ||
| Document Management | ||
| Expense Tracking | ||
| External Integrations | ||
| Forecasting | ||
| Inventory Tracking | ||
| Multi-Currency | ||
| Multi-User | ||
| Notifications | ||
| Prioritization | ||
| Process Reporting | ||
| Project Management | ||
| Resource Management | ||
| Risk Assessment | ||
| Roadmapping | ||
| Scheduling | ||
| Supplier Management | ||
| Third-Party Plugins/Add-Ons | ||
| Workflow Management |
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Get Expert AdviceOpens new windowFloat vs. Runn Integrations
| Integration | Float | Runn |
|---|---|---|
| Asana | ✅ | ❌ |
| Jira | ✅ | ✅ |
| Teamwork | ✅ | ❌ |
| Trello | ✅ | ❌ |
| Slack | ✅ | ❌ |
| Harvest | ❌ | ✅ |
| Clockify | ❌ | ✅ |
| Microsoft Teams | ❌ | ❌ |
| API | ✅ | ✅ |
| Zapier | ✅ | ✅ |
Float's integration with Slack lets you get instant notifications and stay informed about team activities. This is important when it comes to last-minute changes in a busy agency environment. Runn's integration with Harvest is great for teams that need to import timesheets and maintain accurate time tracking for invoicing and billing.
Float vs. Runn Security, Compliance & Reliability
| Factor | Float | Runn |
|---|---|---|
| Data Encryption | Float uses AES-256 encryption to protect data at rest and TLS for data in transit. | passwords one-way encrypted. AES-256 at rest and TLS 1.2+ in transit across regions. |
| Regulatory Compliance | Float complies with GDPR and SOC 2 to maintain user data privacy. | SOC 2 Type II; supports GDPR/CCPA with continuous monitoring (Vanta). |
| Uptime Reliability | Float promises 99.5% uptime and daily backups. | Runn offers continuous monitoring and failover systems. |
Float and Runn both offer strong data security and compliance. To choose the right project and resource management software, assess how each tool's security features align with your compliance and data handling needs.
Float vs. Runn Ease of Use
| Factor | Float | Runn |
|---|---|---|
| User Interface | Float offers a clean, intuitive interface that simplifies resource scheduling. | Runn provides a comprehensive dashboard, but can be overwhelming with its detailed analytics. |
| Onboarding Experience | Float provides step-by-step tutorials and guides that make it easy for new users to start. | Runn offers personalized onboarding sessions, which are helpful but time-consuming. |
| Customer Support | Float has responsive chat and email support available 24/5 to support a global customer base. | Runn offers email support, but response times can vary. |
Float is easier to navigate with its straightforward, user-friendly interface, but Runn's detailed analytics can be overwhelming for new users. While Float is great for quickly getting started, Runn's in-depth features require more time to learn, which makes it harder to get up and running immediately.
Float.com vs Runn: Pros & Cons
Float.com
- Flexible dashboards make managing complex projects more organized.
- Strong forecasting tools support long-term planning and resource allocation.
- Float offers built-in time tracking so you can track actuals and improve accuracy in future resource planning.
- Time tracking features require a higher plan
- Interface can feel overwhelming for small or simple projects.
- New users might need time to navigate and understand the platform's full features.
Runn
- The software includes a skill database, allowing you to assign and filter skills across your team.
- Accurate forecasting tools provide insights into project health and resource needs, and help make informed decisions about future projects.
- Runn's intuitive drag-and-drop interface simplifies reporting, planning, and resource scheduling and lets you make quick adjustments.
- You might run into difficulties exporting data to spreadsheets.
- Integrating with certain external systems can be complex, which can limit your efficiency if you're relying on multiple platforms.
- You might find the customization options inadequate when trying to adapt it to your specific business processes.
Best Use Cases for Float.com and Runn
Float.com
- Creative agencies Float’s visual schedule helps you manage multiple projects and multiple client demands with ease.
- Studios Studios benefit from Float's ability to track time and resources, and you can make sure projects stay on budget with the tool's real-time budget updates.
- Remote teams Float's integrations with Slack and Google Calendar improve communication and coordination, which is vital for remote teams with varied schedules.
- Product development Clear reporting helps you make informed decisions for your development sprints.
- Marketing departments You can quickly adjust schedules to accommodate new campaigns and priorities.
- Tech startups Real-time updates keep your remote teams aligned and responsive to changes.
Runn
- Cross-functional teams The skills management feature helps you assign tasks based on expertise and improve collaboration across departments.
- Marketing teams Its visual timelines help you coordinate campaigns and track deliverables efficiently.
- Consulting firms With Runn, you can quickly adapt to changing client needs through its flexible scheduling.
- Creative agencies Runn lets you handle multiple projects at once with its easy-to-use drag-and-drop features.
- Software development The intuitive timeline view helps with planning sprints and managing project phases seamlessly.
- IT departments Runn's project forecasting and capacity planning features are tailored for IT teams and help you manage resources effectively.
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Get Expert AdviceOpens new windowWho Should Use Float, and Who Should Use Runn?
Float fits agencies and services teams that deal with weekly resourcing and want profit and utilization signals right in the schedule. Runn suits orgs that plan quarters ahead, need scenario modeling, and rely on HR/time tools for a single source of truth. I'd pick Float if your priority is fast allocation and margin guardrails, and I'd choose Runn if your leaders need portfolio forecasts to guide hiring. If your team does both, trial each with a real project and pipeline.
Differences Between Float.com and Runn
| Float.com | Runn | |
|---|---|---|
| Data Visualization | Float provides an intuitive drag-and-drop interface for quick schedule adjustments. | Runn focuses on detailed project timelines with more emphasis on data analysis. |
| Integrations | Float integrates with a wide array of tools like Slack and Asana. | Runn offers fewer integrations but includes key ones like Harvest for time tracking. |
| Onboarding | Float offers easy-to-follow tutorials for quick setup. | Runn provides personalized onboarding sessions, which can be more time-consuming. |
| Pricing | Pay-per-scheduled-person approach offers greater flexibility for teams with fluctuating workloads, since you can add or remove active users as needed. | Defines a “person” as anyone allocated to a project, which can make short-term project allocations slightly less dynamic from a billing perspective. |
| Visit Float.comOpens new window | Read Runn ReviewOpens new window |
Similarities Between Float.com and Runn
| Cross-Platform Access | Both offer access across various devices to make it easy for your team members to stay connected on the go. |
|---|---|
| Customization | Each platform provides customization options so you can tailor the software to your team's needs. |
| Data Security | Float and Runn both prioritize data security and use encryption to protect your information. |
| Resource Management | Both Float and Runn excel in resource management and help with effective resource allocation and task management. Float uses visual timelines, while Runn offers detailed resource analytics. |
| Subscription Model | Both tools operate on a subscription model with flexible and scalable plans that cater to different team sizes and feature needs. |
| Visit Float.comOpens new window Read Runn ReviewOpens new window | |