Toggl vs. Harvest: Expert Reviews & Comparison 2026

I compare Toggl’s flexible tracking and planning tools with Harvest’s budgets, invoicing, and payments to help you find the better fit for how your team works.

By Galen Low on Oct 22, 2026

15-year PM leader transforming digital project management in the AI age.

Clicks on links below may earn a commission, which supports our independent testing and review of software and services. Learn more about how we stay transparent.

Why Trust Our Reviews?

Time tracking can tell you where the hours went, but not always whether the work stayed profitable. The better fit depends on how tightly you want time data connected to budgets, billing, and project planning.

Picking between Toggl and Harvest comes down to whether you want time data feeding planning and capacity, or flowing straight into budgets, invoices, and payments. When scope shifts and logged hours are hard to connect to budgets, the right time tracking software can help you see where work stands. I’ll compare the tools’ pros and cons, use cases, pricing, security, and usability so you can choose the better fit for your projects.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Overview
Why Trust Us
Pricing Comparison
Features
Integrations
Security
Ease of Use
Pros & Cons
Best Use Cases
Differences
Similarities

Toggl vs. Harvest: An Overview

Why Trust Our Software Recommendations

Toggl vs. Harvest Pricing Comparison

	Toggl	Harvest
Free Trial	Free plan available; 30-day free trial; Free demo available	Free trial + free plan available
Pricing	From $9/user/month	From $9/user/month (billed annually)

Visit Toggl Read Harvest Review

Toggl vs. Harvest Pricing & Hidden Costs

Toggl uses per-user pricing, with a free plan for up to three users and paid plans billed monthly or annually. Its optional Time Off Pro and Capacity Management add-ons cost extra. Harvest’s free plan covers a single seat and two projects, while its Teams and Enterprise plans charge per seat, with a discount for annual billing and custom pricing for Enterprise Plus. On paid plans, extra invoices, projects, clients, and tasks are billed by usage, and added seats are prorated but can only be reduced at renewal.

Before choosing, estimate both seat count and activity over a typical billing period. For Harvest, check how usage charges could change as projects, clients, and invoices grow, and plan seat counts around renewal dates. For Toggl, include add-ons and decide whether you need Premium for approvals, profitability reports, or Jira and Asana syncs. Use each tool’s trial to test your expected setup, and review annual commitments, renewal terms, and billing details before you decide.

Toggl vs. Harvest Feature Comparison

Both Toggl and Harvest let teams track time against projects, set billable rates, and compare logged time with project budgets. Both also reserve timesheet approvals, profitability reports, and SAML single sign-on for their upper tiers.

Toggl’s differentiator is private desktop activity capture that turns app and website usage into reviewable entries, plus planning views such as boards and timelines built on task estimates. Harvest pairs time and expense tracking with client invoicing and online payments, so teams can bill directly from recorded work, while scheduling lives in its separate Forecast product.

	Toggl	Harvest
API
Analytics
Approval Workflows
Attendance Tracking
Batch Permissions & Access
Billing/Invoicing
Budgeting
Calendar Management
Dashboard
Data Export
Data Import
Data Visualization
Expense Tracking
External Integrations
Forecasting
Multi-User
Notifications
Project Management
Resource Management
Scheduling
Task Scheduling/Tracking
Time Management
Timesheets
Vacation & Absence Calendar

Visit Toggl Read Harvest Review

Toggl vs. Harvest Integrations

Integration	Toggl	Harvest
Asana	✅	✅
Jira	✅	✅
Slack	✅	✅
Google Calendar	✅	✅
Outlook Calendar	✅	✅
Todoist	✅	❌
Google Docs	✅	❌
Trello	❌	✅
Xero	❌	✅
Stripe	❌	✅
API	✅	✅
MCP Server	✅	❌
Zapier	❌	✅

Toggl and Harvest share core project, chat, and calendar integrations, and both offer an API for custom connections. Toggl reaches tools like Todoist and Google Docs through its browser extension and adds an MCP server for AI assistants, though its Jira and Asana syncs need Premium. Harvest leans into finance, syncing invoices and payments with QuickBooks Online and Xero, taking client payments through Stripe and PayPal, and automating workflows through Zapier and Make. Check for must-have tools like accounting apps before choosing.

Toggl vs. Harvest Security, Compliance & Reliability

Factor	Toggl	Harvest
Privacy	Toggl leaves out screenshots, keystroke logging, and location tracking, and keeps desktop activity private to each user.	Harvest doesn’t take screenshots, record video, or track the apps and websites you use, and processes data in the U.S.
Compliance	Toggl holds a SOC 2 Type II attestation and ISO/IEC 27001 certification, and complies with GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, and the EU Data Act.	Harvest offers a GDPR data processing agreement and holds a PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate, while relying on its hosting provider’s SOC 2 audit.
Encryption	Toggl encrypts data in transit with TLS and at rest with AES, backups included.	Harvest encrypts data in transit and at rest, with secure connections on by default for every account.
Access Controls	Toggl offers SAML single sign-on on Premium, role-based access, passkey logins, and mandatory MFA for critical internal systems.	Harvest offers account-wide two-factor authentication, Google sign-in, SAML single sign-on on Enterprise, and an immutable audit trail for support access to customer data.
Reliability	Toggl runs on Google Cloud with encrypted automated backups, regular disaster recovery tests, and a public status page.	Harvest runs on multi-zone Google Cloud infrastructure with daily backups, a regularly reviewed incident response plan, and a public status page.

Toggl has the stronger documented security and compliance posture, while Harvest provides meaningful safeguards but relies on its hosting provider’s SOC 2 audit. I’d favor Toggl for its independent certifications and recovery planning, while Harvest’s privacy stance and PCI-certified payment handling suit teams centered on client billing; I’d test sync and entry-saving behavior in a pilot either way.

Toggl vs. Harvest Ease of Use

Factor	Toggl	Harvest
Starting Timers	Start a timer with a click, then assign it to a client, project, or task.	Pick a project and task from the timesheet, or start a timer from Slack or the browser extension.
Time Entry	Use the timer, calendar events, or manual entries, though some users find manual entry clunky.	Fill in daily or weekly timesheets, pull in Google or Outlook calendar events, or use the desktop and mobile apps.
Project Setup	Organize work with clients, projects, tasks, and tags, with admin guides and free importers to speed setup.	Set up projects and tasks with hour- or fee-based budgets and alerts, and add custom reminders to build tracking habits.
Mobile Workflow	Track time across desktop, browser, and mobile apps, though sync hiccups can occur.	Track time and snap receipt photos for expenses on iOS and Android, though the free plan only lists the Mac and iOS apps.

Toggl feels quicker for basic time tracking, while Harvest is equally approachable when you also need timesheets, expenses, and billing. In my experience, Toggl’s low-friction timer and flexible project tagging suit changing work, while Harvest’s clear timesheets and direct path from logged hours to invoices make billing simpler.

Toggl vs Harvest: Pros & Cons

Best Use Cases for Toggl and Harvest

Toggl

Small Agencies Agencies with up to three users can start on the free plan, then add billable rates and team or revenue reports with Starter.
Consulting And Accounting Firms Firms that bill by the hour can run timers or log missed work manually, then use billable rates and retainer projects to track client time.
Software Teams Teams working in Jira, GitHub, Asana, or Slack can connect Toggl to those tools, though Jira and Asana syncs need Premium and only pull data into Toggl.
Client-Service Teams Teams can organize time entries by project, client, and tag, and use paid plans for billable rates, revenue reports, and labor costs.
Project Leads Project leads who need oversight can use Premium’s project dashboards and forecasts, profitability reports, and timesheet approvals.
In-House Service Teams In-house IT, engineering, and PMO groups can plan resources around time off and holidays in Timeline, though formal leave policies, accrual tracking, and time-off approvals need the Time Off Pro add-on.

Harvest

Creative Agencies Harvest helps your team track billable hours and manage multiple projects efficiently with clear reporting.
Consultancies Your consultancy can benefit from Harvest's ability to generate invoices directly from tracked hours, simplifying billing.
Small Businesses Harvest's user-friendly interface supports small teams in managing time and budgets without unnecessary complexity.
Design Teams Design teams appreciate Harvest's easy time tracking, helping manage project hours accurately and efficiently.
Marketing Departments Marketing departments can track how much time is spent on campaigns and budgets, helping ensure projects stay on time and within budget.
Professional Services Professional service providers use Harvest for its seamless tracking and reporting, enhancing project oversight.

Visit Toggl Read Harvest Review

Who Should Use Toggl, and Who Should Use Harvest?

Choose Toggl if your team needs flexible time tracking for shifting projects, plus planning views, capacity tools, and a private activity timeline to review tracked work. It’s a better fit when you want time data to drive planning and margins rather than invoicing. Choose Harvest if your team needs to connect project hours and expenses directly to budgets, client invoices, and online payments. It suits service teams that bill clients and want a clear path from timesheets to payment, with Forecast available for scheduling.

Differences Between Toggl and Harvest

	Toggl	Harvest
Client Billing	Tracks billable rates and profitability, but built-in invoicing hasn’t arrived in the new Toggl yet.	Turns tracked time and expenses into client invoices, with online payments, late reminders, and recurring invoices.
Planning	Boards, task lists, timelines, and estimates help teams plan work alongside time tracking.	Offers team capacity tracking on paid plans and connects to Harvest Forecast, a separate tool, for scheduling.
Pricing Model	Uses per-user pricing for paid plans, with optional add-ons that cost extra.	Charges per seat, plus usage-based fees for extra invoices, projects, clients, and tasks.
Time Tracking	Start a timer, then assign it to a project or task; a private activity timeline can record apps and websites for review.	Run timers or fill in timesheets by project and task, with calendar imports and desktop, mobile, and browser apps.
	Visit TogglOpens new window	Read Harvest ReviewOpens new window

Similarities Between Toggl and Harvest

Budget Tracking	Both help you compare logged time with project budgets. Toggl ties budget alerts to task estimates and project dashboards, while Harvest offers hour- or fee-based budgets with alerts for client work.
Mobile Access	Both let teams track time away from the web app. Toggl offers mobile apps alongside desktop and browser options, while Harvest’s mobile app supports time and expense tracking on the go.
Project Structure	Both let you organize time around clients, projects, and tasks. Toggl also supports tags for flexible categorization, while Harvest uses project tasks to structure timesheets.
Reports	Both provide profitability and utilization reports on upper tiers. Toggl adds workload and forecast views, while Harvest lets you save custom reports and schedule them to send automatically.
Time Entry	Both support timers and manual time entry. In Toggl, you can start a timer, add time manually, or pull from your calendar; Harvest lets you track from a timer, a timesheet, or calendar events.
Visit TogglOpens new window Read Harvest ReviewOpens new window