TMetric mod Everhour: Sammenligning og ekspertanmeldelser for 2026
Project boards can show what needs to get done, but they do not always explain where the team’s time actually went. When tasks, estimates, timesheets, and budgets tell different stories, even a well-planned project can become difficult to manage.
TMetric and Everhour are time tracking software tools that bring time data closer to daily project work. TMetric focuses on structured tracking, approvals, billing, reporting, and profitability, while Everhour embeds timers, estimates, budgets, and workload planning into project management workflows.
In this comparison, I’ll help you decide which tool better supports your team’s time management and productivity.
TMetric vs. Everhour: An Overview
TMetric
Visit TMetricOpens new windowEverhour
Read Everhour ReviewOpens new windowWhy Trust Our Software Recommendations
Our team has been testing and reviewing software since 2012. As project managers ourselves, we know how difficult—and important—it is to choose the right software.
For this guide, we evaluated tools using hands-on testing and independent research, scoring tools using our selection criteria. We also draw on insights from industry thought leaders and practicing project management experts.
Our reviews reflect our human editorial judgment, not a sales pitch.
Expert reviewers:
TMetric vs. Everhour Pricing Comparison
| TMetric | Everhour | |
|---|---|---|
| Free Trial | Free plan available + 14-day free trial | Free plan available |
| Pricing | From $5.83/user/month (billed annually) | From $8.50/user/month (billed annually) |
TMetric vs. Everhour: Priser og skjulte omkostninger
TMetric tilbyder større fleksibilitet i prissætningen, men den frihed kræver lidt ekstra forarbejde. De betalte funktioner er fordelt på flere niveauer, så fakturering, godkendelser, fremmøde, PTO og overvågning kan kræve en opgradering. Desuden tæller ejeren af arbejdsområdet stadig som en betalt brugerplads. Everhour holder derimod prissætningen enklere ved at inkludere de vigtigste funktioner i én betalt plan. Den gratis plan udelukker dog integrationer, og kravet om et minimumsantal brugerpladser kan gøre den mindre økonomisk fordelagtig for meget små teams.
I sidste ende bør ingen af værktøjerne vurderes ud fra deres startplan alene. Sammenlign i stedet de samlede omkostninger ud fra det forventede antal brugere, og undersøg derefter, hvilket niveau der inkluderer den fakturering, de godkendelser, integrationer og den support, jeres team faktisk vil bruge.
TMetric vs. Everhour Feature Comparison
| TMetric | Everhour | |
|---|---|---|
| API | ||
| Analytics | ||
| Approval Workflows | ||
| Attendance Tracking | ||
| Batch Permissions & Access | ||
| Billing/Invoicing | ||
| Budgeting | ||
| Calendar Management | ||
| Dashboard | ||
| Data Export | ||
| Data Import | ||
| Data Visualization | ||
| Expense Tracking | ||
| External Integrations | ||
| Forecasting | ||
| Multi-User | ||
| Notifications | ||
| Project Management | ||
| Resource Management | ||
| Scheduling | ||
| Task Scheduling/Tracking | ||
| Time Management | ||
| Timesheets | ||
| Vacation & Absence Calendar |
TMetric vs. Everhour: Integrationer
| Integration | TMetric | Everhour |
|---|---|---|
| Asana | ✅ | ✅ |
| Trello | ✅ | ✅ |
| Jira | ✅ | ✅ |
| GitHub | ✅ | ✅ |
| Basecamp | ❌ | ✅ |
| QuickBooks | ✅ | ✅ |
| ClickUp | ✅ | ✅ |
| Bitbucket | ✅ | ✅ |
| GitLab | ✅ | ✅ |
| Salesforce | ✅ | ✅ |
| API | ✅ | ✅ |
| Zapier | ✅ | ✅ |
TMetric og Everhour integrerer begge med udbredte værktøjer til projektstyring, regnskab og samarbejde, så de fleste teams bør have let ved at indarbejde et af dem i deres eksisterende opsætning. Everhour tilbyder dog en lidt bredere indbygget dækning, mens TMetric kombinerer sine indbyggede integrationer med API- og automatiseringsmuligheder til mindre almindelige arbejdsgange. Forskellen er ikke markant, men Everhour kan kræve færre alternative løsninger for teams med en mere varieret softwarepakke.
TMetric vs. Everhour Sikkerhed, compliance & pålidelighed
| Faktor | TMetric | Everhour |
|---|---|---|
| Datahåndtering og -lagring | Gemmer projekt-, tids-, opgave- og aktivitetsdata i Microsoft Azures region Vesteuropa. IP-adresser anonymiseres, og betalingsoplysninger sendes gennem Verifone i stedet for at blive gemt som kortdata. | Gemmer data på AWS i Oregon og Frankfurt med regional replikering. Betalingsoplysninger gemmes ikke af Everhour. |
| Regulatorisk overholdelse | Understøtter GDPR-rettigheder vedrørende adgang, begrænsning, dataportabilitet, indsigelse og sletning. En GDPR-kompatibel databehandleraftale er tilgængelig for EU-kunder. | Understøtter GDPR-krav og har et PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate, samtidig med at tjenesten benytter AWS-værtens SOC 2-kontroller. |
| Infrastruktursikkerhed | Anvender Microsoft Azure til databaser, importfiler og krypterede sikkerhedskopiarkiver. Gemte tjenestedata kan ikke læses af Microsoft. | Anvender TLS 1.2, krypterede sikkerhedskopier, hash-kodede og saltede adgangskoder, AWS WAF samt krypteret kommunikation mellem servere og datacentre. |
| Adgangskontroller | Arbejdsområdets administratorer styrer aktivitetssporing, overvågning af apps og websteder, status for tastatur- og museaktivitet samt valgfri skærmbilleder. TMetric registrerer ikke, hvad brugerne skriver. | Understøtter SSO og kontotilladelser, mens medarbejderes adgang til kundedata er begrænset, logget og kun tilladt i forbindelse med fejlfinding. |
| Pålidelighed | Opbevarer krypterede og komprimerede sikkerhedskopier uden for stedet i 30 dage, og slettede data fjernes, når de tilhørende sikkerhedskopier udløber. | Kører daglige krypterede sikkerhedskopier på mindst to datacentre, opbevarer dem i 30 dage og rapporterer en gennemsnitlig oppetid på 99 %. |
Samlet set tilbyder begge værktøjer et solidt sikkerhedsgrundlag, men deres prioriteter er forskellige. TMetric lægger større vægt på privatlivskontroller og konfigurerbar medarbejderovervågning, mens Everhour giver flere oplysninger om infrastrukturen, regional redundans, SSO og logget supportadgang. I sidste ende bør teams sammenligne deres overvågningspolitikker, krav til overholdelse af regler samt forventninger til offentligt tilgængelig sikkerhedsdokumentation.
TMetric vs. Everhour Brugervenlighed
| Faktor | TMetric | Everhour |
|---|---|---|
| Brugergrænseflade | Samler timere, projekter, timesedler, rapporter, fakturering og teamaktivitet i et enkelt arbejdsområde med desktop-, mobil-, web- og browserløsninger til daglig registrering. | Fokuserer oplevelsen på projekt- og opgavesynlighed, hvor tidsregistrering er integreret direkte i de understøttede projektstyringsværktøjer. |
| Introduktion | Anvender en selvbetjent opsætning, hvor teams opretter et arbejdsområde, inviterer medlemmer, installerer de nødvendige apps og konfigurerer projekter. Hjælpeartikler, trin-for-trin-vejledninger, videoer, demonstrationer og CSV-import er tilgængelige som ekstra vejledning. | Teams kan forbinde deres eksisterende projektværktøjer, synkronisere projekter og opgaver, invitere medlemmer og begynde at registrere tid med minimal genopbygning. Større organisationer kan også anmode om personlige demonstrationer før implementering. |
| Tilpasning | Giver teams mulighed for at justere rapportfiltre, faktureringssatser, perioder for timesedler, meddelelser, tilladelser og valgfri overvågningsindstillinger, så de passer til forskellige arbejdsgange. | Tilbyder fleksible rapporter, opgaveestimater, projektbudgetter, arbejdsbelastningsplanlægning, tilladelser og visninger, der tilpasses den måde, teams organiserer arbejdet på. |
| Support | Yder assistance døgnet rundt via livechat og e-mail samt et hjælpecenter, videovejledninger og valgfri produktdemonstrationer. | Tilbyder en vidensbase og direkte support, mens Custom-abonnementet giver prioriterede svar og en dedikeret administrator. |
TMetric har en mere struktureret tilgang, hvor godkendelser, faktureringssatser, overvågningsregler og flere registreringsapps giver teams større kontrol over, hvordan tid registreres og administreres. Everhour føles derimod hurtigere at tage i brug for teams, der allerede arbejder i projektstyringstavler, eftersom projekter og opgaver kan synkroniseres med mindre opsætning. I sidste ende er TMetric bedst til teams, der værdsætter konfigurerbare arbejdsgange og mere præcise tidsregistreringer, mens Everhour passer til dem, der prioriterer integreret bekvemmelighed.
TMetric vs Everhour: Pros & Cons
TMetric
- Tracks billable and non-billable time across web, desktop, mobile, and browser extensions.
- Shows project revenue, labor costs, budgets, and margins in profitability reports.
- Creates invoices from billable time entries and syncs invoice data with QuickBooks and Xero.
- Manual tracking depends on users consistently starting timers or adding entries.
- The mobile app offers fewer reporting and management features than the web app.
- Payroll tools calculate labor costs but do not process payments or taxes.
Everhour
- Real-time budget tracking for projects and clients
- Detailed, exportable reports break down time by task
- Billable and non-billable hours easily distinguished
- No built-in invoicing in the base plan
- Mobile app lacks advanced features
- Limited offline time entry support
Best Use Cases for TMetric and Everhour
TMetric
- Small and Mid-Sized Service Teams TMetric fits teams of roughly 5 to 200 people that need time tracking, approvals, attendance, PTO, billing, and project reporting in a self-serve platform.
- Software Development Teams Development teams can track time by task, project, and client while connecting TMetric with tools such as Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Redmine, and ClickUp.
- Professional Services Firms Professional services firms can approve billable hours, apply different rates, create invoices, and monitor the profitability of each engagement.
- Consulting Teams Consultants can organize time across clients and engagements while using configurable rates to support different contracts, roles, and work types.
- Marketing and Media Teams Marketing and media teams can track time by campaign, client, and task to compare delivery hours with budgets and project margins.
- Legal Service Teams Legal teams can use TMetric for client- and matter-based time tracking and invoicing, though it does not replace legal practice management or trust accounting software.
Everhour
- Creative Agencies Agencies see strong value in Everhour’s project and client-based time tracking and budget alerts for billable work.
- Software Teams Engineering and product teams get native integration with major PM tools and easy sprint, epic, and task tracking.
- Consulting Firms Consulting teams benefit from detailed client-based reporting, billable time tracking, and quick export for invoicing.
- Remote Teams Distributed teams use Everhour’s browser-based entry, approval flows, and live dashboards to keep visibility and coordination high.
- Marketing Departments Marketing teams can track campaigns and client projects separately and report on billable vs. internal work effortlessly.
- Startups (5-100 Employees) Small and midsize companies find the onboarding fast and user management intuitive without sacrificing advanced features.
Hvem bør bruge TMetric, og hvem bør bruge Everhour?
Hvis du leder efter tidsregistreringssoftware, der giver serviceorienterede teams bedre kontrol over fakturerbare timer, godkendelser, fakturering, lønomkostninger og projektindtjening, er TMetric sandsynligvis det bedste valg. Det fungerer især godt for softwareteams, konsulentvirksomheder, marketingbureauer, medievirksomheder og advokatfirmaer, der har brug for præcise tidsregistreringer og et tydeligere overblik over, hvordan projektarbejde påvirker indtjening og avancer.
Hvis dit team derimod allerede håndterer det meste af sit arbejde i projektboards og ønsker, at tidsregistrering skal føles som en del af denne arbejdsgang, kan Everhour være det stærkere valg. Dets sporing på opgaveniveau, planlægning af arbejdsbelastning, budgetadvarsler og tilpasselige rapporter gør det velegnet til bureauer, SaaS-teams, startups og fjernteams, der ønsker, at planlægnings- og tidsdata er tæt forbundet.
Differences Between TMetric and Everhour
| TMetric | Everhour | |
|---|---|---|
| Project Financials | Connects tracked hours, billing rates, labor costs, budgets, revenue, and margins through its Project Profitability Report. Rates can be configured by workspace, project, client, or team member. | Focuses more on project estimates, live budget progress, expenses, and threshold alerts, helping managers compare planned work with actual time and spending. |
| Reporting Style | Provides structured Summary, Detailed, Activity, and Profitability reports with filters by user, project, client, tag, and date range. | Offers more customizable reports, allowing teams to adjust columns, ordering, filters, and conditional formatting for different stakeholders. |
| Task Management | Organizes tasks within projects and connects tracked task time to timesheets, billing, and profitability records. | Places more emphasis on creating and organizing tasks, setting task estimates, and monitoring how much planned time remains. |
| Tracking Experience | Tracks time across web, desktop, mobile, and browser extensions, with offline entries syncing once the connection returns. Each entry can be tied to a task, project, client, and billing status. | Embeds timers directly into supported project management tools and automatically syncs existing projects and tasks, making it easier to track work without leaving the project board. |
| Workforce Management Approach | Includes attendance, PTO, activity levels, app and website monitoring, and optional screenshots for teams that need time and workforce records together. | Leans more toward resource planning, with visual schedules and workload views that help managers see who is available, overloaded, or ready for more work. |
| Visit TMetricOpens new window | Read Everhour ReviewOpens new window |
Similarities Between TMetric and Everhour
| Billing and Invoicing | Both connect tracked hours to billable rates and client invoices, reducing the manual work required to turn completed tasks into something finance can actually charge for. |
|---|---|
| Reporting and Exports | Both provide filterable reports covering users, projects, clients, and date ranges. Teams can export the results for internal reviews, client updates, or further analysis outside the platform. |
| Roles and Permissions | Both support role-based access and team permissions, allowing managers to control who can view, approve, edit, or administer time and project information. |
| Time Entry Methods | Both let users run timers as they work or add and edit hours afterward. This flexibility supports accurate tracking without forcing every employee into the same routine. |
| Timesheet Approvals | Both turn recorded hours into reviewable timesheets that managers can approve or reject. This creates a cleaner checkpoint before time is used for billing, payroll preparation, or client reports. |
| Visit TMetricOpens new window Read Everhour ReviewOpens new window | |
